Comparison of morphological features in the femur between femoral neck fractures and femoral intertrochanteric fractures

被引:11
作者
Yamauchi, Koun [1 ]
Naofumi, Mitsuishi [2 ]
Sumida, Hisashi [2 ]
Fukuta, Shoji [2 ]
Hori, Hirohiko [2 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya Univ, Res Ctr Hlth Phys Fitness & Sports, Chikusa Ku, Furo Cho, Nagoya, Aichi 4648601, Japan
[2] Hikone Municipal Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Hikone City, Shiga, Japan
关键词
Morphology; Proximal femoral fractures; Femur; Acetabulum; Japanese population; BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; HIP FRACTURE; RISK; PREDICTION; GEOMETRY; PARAMETERS; EPIDOS; IMPACT; WOMEN; FALL;
D O I
10.1007/s00276-016-1626-9
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to make proximal femur fracture types more predictable by considering morphological features of an acetabulum as well as of a proximal femur in the Japanese population. A retrospective review of radiographs of the proximal femoral fractures was conducted in patients registered from 2010 to 2012, dividing into patients with femoral neck fractures; Group Neck (n = 101), and patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures; Group IT (n = 99). Intergroup comparison was conducted: age, sex, height, weight, the ratios of femoral intertrochanteric length (IT Length), femoral neck length (Neck Length), femoral neck width (Neck Width), lateral offset length (Offset) to femoral head diameter, neck-shaft angle (N-S angle), and center-edge angle of the acetabulum (C-E angle), adjusting for age. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted among these parameters. The Group IT showed significantly older age than the Group Neck. Greater C-E angle in Group IT was observed in the patients in their 80s and 90s years of age. The Group Neck showed greater N-S angle only in the patients in their 80s years of age. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the impact of the age and the C-E angle on the fracture types was similar (odds ratio 1.08, 1.09, respectively, p < 0.01 both). Age, N-S angle, and C-E angle could be independent predictors for determining the proximal femur fracture types.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 780
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Different morphometric and densitometric parameters predict cervical and trochanteric hip fracture: The EPIDOS study [J].
Duboeuf, F ;
Hans, D ;
Schott, AM ;
Kotzki, PO ;
Favier, F ;
Marcelli, C ;
Meunier, PJ ;
Delmas, PD .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1997, 12 (11) :1895-1902
[2]   MORPHOLOGY OF THE FEMUR IN PROXIMAL FEMORAL FRACTURES [J].
FERRIS, BD ;
KENNEDY, C ;
BHAMRA, M ;
MUIRHEADALLWOOD, W .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1989, 71 (03) :475-477
[3]  
GLUER CC, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P671
[4]   Proximal femur geometry to detect and distinguish femoral neck fractures from trochanteric fractures in postmenopausal women [J].
Gnudi, S ;
Ripamonti, C ;
Lisi, L ;
Fini, M ;
Giardino, R ;
Giavaresi, G .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 13 (01) :69-73
[5]  
GREENSPAN SL, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P1889
[6]   Fall direction, bone mineral density, and function: Risk factors for hip fracture in frail nursing home elderly [J].
Greenspan, SL ;
Myers, ER ;
Kiel, DP ;
Parker, RA ;
Hayes, WC ;
Resnick, NM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 104 (06) :539-545
[7]   IMPACT NEAR THE HIP DOMINATES FRACTURE RISK IN ELDERLY NURSING-HOME RESIDENTS WHO FALL [J].
HAYES, WC ;
MYERS, ER ;
MORRIS, JN ;
GERHART, TN ;
YETT, HS ;
LIPSITZ, LA .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1993, 52 (03) :192-198
[8]   A retrospective analysis of bilateral fractures over sixteen years: localisation and variation in treatment of second hip fractures [J].
Kok, Laura M. ;
van der Steenhoven, Tim J. ;
Nelissen, Rob G. H. H. .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2011, 35 (10) :1545-1551
[9]   Are the etiologies of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures different? [J].
Mautalen, CA ;
Vega, EM ;
Einhorn, TA .
BONE, 1996, 18 (03) :S133-S137
[10]   Bone mineral density, hip axis length and risk of hip fracture in men: Results from the Cornwall Hip Fracture Study [J].
Pande, I ;
O'Neill, TW ;
Pritchard, C ;
Scott, DL ;
Woolf, AD .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 (10) :866-870