An open-label, randomized, multicenter dose-finding study of once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim versus daily filgrastim in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy

被引:16
|
作者
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Jiang, Zhiwei [1 ]
Wang, Ling [1 ]
Li, Chanjuan [1 ]
Xia, Jielai [1 ]
机构
[1] Fourth Mil Med Univ, Sch Prevent Med, Dept Hlth Stat, Xian 710032, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast cancer; TAC chemotherapy; Neutropenia; Pegfilgrastim; Phase II clinical trial; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; SINGLE-ADMINISTRATION PEGFILGRASTIM; ADJUVANT DOCETAXEL; INDUCED NEUTROPENIA; CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; DOXORUBICIN; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s12032-015-0537-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) has been accepted as a standard care because of their superior clinical benefit in early-stage breast cancer patients, but with a higher risk of neutropenia. Pegfilgrastim is a once-per-cycle therapy for prophylactic neutrophil support and neutropenia prevention. There was still a lack of direct evidences for finding an optimal fixed dose of pegfilgrastim in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving TAC regimen. An open-label, randomized, phase II study was designed to compare the effects of pegfilgrastim with filgrastim. Eighteen centers in China enrolled 171 eligible female breast cancer patients with cycles of TAC chemotherapy treatment, randomized into four arms, received a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (60, 100 or 120 mu g/kg) per chemotherapy cycle or daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 5 mu g/kg 24 h after chemotherapy. Efficacy and safety were analyzed. In ITT population, the mean duration of grade 3+ neutropenia (neutrophil count <1.0 x 10(9)/l) was 2.09, 1.53 and 1.73 days in patients who received pegfilgrastim 60, 100 and 120 mu g/kg/cycle, respectively, and 1.69 days in patients who received 5 mu g/kg/day filgrastim (P = 0.043). The incidence of grade 3+ neutropenia was 76, 83 and 74 % for doses of pegfilgrastim and 90 % for filgrastim (P = 0.409). The results for febrile neutropenia, time to neutrophil recovery and neutrophil profile were also not significantly different between arms. The safety profiles of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim were similar. A single dose of 100 mu g/kg once-per-cycle administration of pegfilgrastim provided neutrophil support and a safety profile comparable to daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim in Chinese breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Advantages with prophylactic PEG-rhG-CSF versus rhG-CSF in breast cancer patients receiving multiple cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy: an open-label, randomized, multicenter phase III study
    Jie Xie
    Jun Cao
    Jing-fen Wang
    Bai-hong Zhang
    Xiao-hua Zeng
    Hong Zheng
    Yang Zhang
    Li Cai
    Yu-dong Wu
    Qiang Yao
    Xiao-chun Zhao
    Wei-dong Mao
    Ai-Mei Jiang
    Shao-shui Chen
    Shun-e Yang
    Shu-sen Wang
    Jian-hong Wang
    Yue-yin Pan
    Bi-yong Ren
    Yan-ju Chen
    Li-zhi Ouyang
    Kai-jian Lei
    Jing-hua Gao
    Wen-he Huang
    Zhan Huang
    Tao Shou
    Yan-ling He
    Jing Cheng
    Yang Sun
    Wei-ming Li
    Shu-de Cui
    Xin Wang
    Zhi-guo Rao
    Hu Ma
    Wei Liu
    Xue-yong Wu
    Wei-xi Shen
    Fei-lin Cao
    Ze-min Xiao
    Biao Wu
    Shu-yan Tian
    Dong Meng
    Peng Shen
    Bi-yun Wang
    Zhonghua Wang
    Jian Zhang
    Leiping Wang
    Xi-chun Hu
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 168 : 389 - 399
  • [22] Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy
    Igor Bondarenko
    Oleg A Gladkov
    Reiner Elsaesser
    Anton Buchner
    Peter Bias
    BMC Cancer, 13
  • [23] A randomized, double-blind, active control, multicenter, dose-finding study of lipegfilgrastim (XM22) in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive therapy
    Anton Buchner
    Reiner Elsässer
    Peter Bias
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2014, 148 : 107 - 116
  • [24] Efbemalenograstim alfa not inferior to pegfilgrastim in providing neutrophil support in women with breast cancer undergoing myelotoxic chemotherapy: results of a phase 2 randomized, multicenter, open-label trial
    John Glaspy
    Igor Bondarenko
    Dmitrii Krasnozhon
    Dean Rutty
    Jianmin Chen
    Yanyan Fu
    Shufang Wang
    Qingsong Hou
    Simon Li
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024, 32
  • [25] Low-dose pegylated recombinant human granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as hematopoietic support for adjuvant chemotherapy in Chinese patients with breast cancer: An open-label, randomized, non-inferiority trial
    Yang, Sheng
    Chen, Shan-shan
    Zhang, Chang-gong
    Zhou, Ying-lei
    Xiu, Meng
    Zhang, Pin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 90 (10) : 2621 - 2629
  • [26] Additional therapy with mistletoe extracts in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. A prospective randomized open label pilot study
    Troeger, Wilfried
    PHYTOMEDICINE, 2007, 14 : 38 - 38
  • [27] A randomized, multicenter, phase II/III study to determine the optimal dose and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegteograstim (GCPGC) on chemotherapy-induced neutropenia compared to pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients: KCSG PC10-09
    Lee, Ki Hyeong
    Kim, Ji-Yeon
    Lee, Moon Hee
    Han, Hye Sook
    Lim, Joo Han
    Park, Keon Uk
    Park, In Hae
    Cho, Eun Kyung
    Yoon, So Young
    Kim, Jee Hyun
    Choi, In Sil
    Park, Jae Hoo
    Choi, Young Jin
    Kim, Hee-Jun
    Jung, Kyung Hae
    Kim, Si-Young
    Oh, Do-Youn
    Im, Seock-Ah
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (04) : 1709 - 1717
  • [28] Olanzapine versus aprepitant for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen: A prospective, nonrandomized, open-label study
    Shivaprakash, G.
    Udupa, Karthik S.
    Sarayu, V.
    Thomas, Joseph
    Gupta, Vishal
    Pallavi, L. C.
    Pemminati, Sudhakar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 2017, 49 (06) : 451 - 457
  • [29] Clinical confirmation to demonstrate similarity for a biosimilar pegfilgrastim: a 3-way randomized equivalence study for a proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim versus US-licensed and EU-approved reference products in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
    Desai, Kalpna
    Misra, Priya
    Kher, Sanyukta
    Shah, Nirmesh
    EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY & ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7
  • [30] Protocol for studying the efficiency of ChemoCalc software in helping patients to understand drug treatment costs for breast cancer: A multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 study
    Kuba, Sayaka
    Moriuchi, Hiroki
    Yamanouchi, Kosho
    Shibata, Kenichiro
    Yano, Hiroshi
    Oikawa, Masahiro
    Maeda, Shigeto
    Meng, Xiangyue
    Morita, Michi
    Hatachi, Toshiko
    Otsubo, Ryota
    Matsumoto, Megumi
    Miyamoto, Junya
    Kanetaka, Kengo
    Taniguchi, Hideki
    Nagayasu, Takeshi
    Eguchi, Susumu
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 21