Measuring to manage: Reconfiguring people-water relations through water measurement standards and technologies in New Zealand

被引:6
作者
Myles, Fiona [1 ]
Duncan, Ronlyn [1 ]
Brower, Ann [1 ]
机构
[1] Lincoln Univ, Dept Environm Management, POB 85084, Christchurch 7647, New Zealand
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 2016年 / 34卷 / 03期
关键词
co-production; measurement practices; standards; freshwater management; New Zealand;
D O I
10.1177/0263774X15614676
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a water management case study from New Zealand's South Island region of Canterbury. It examines how the introduction of standards and technologies to measure, monitor and manage the use of groundwater for agriculture has made visible new identities for farmers, not just water use. It finds that recently introduced measurement regulations have allowed farmers to confidently constitute themselves as rule followers and environmental protectors. Using a co-production analytical framework, this article illustrates how measurement standards have reconfigured the relations between people and water. Farmers subject to the new measurement practices and technologies have enrolled these technologies to contest dominant narratives and identities, such as rule breakers and resource squanderers, and deploy counter configurations in contests over resource allocation. In other words, this paper finds that standards can create new forms of political agency for the measured, not just the measurers.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 558
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SIT OUTL PRIM IND 20
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, LC0708137 LANDC RES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS N
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, WAT QUAL NZ LAND US
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
[6]  
Bowker G. C., 2000, SORTING THINGS OUT C
[7]  
Busch L, 2011, INFRASTRUCT SER, P1
[8]   The moral economy of grades and standards [J].
Busch, L .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2000, 16 (03) :273-283
[9]  
Canterbury Mayoral Forum, 2009, CANT WAT MAN STRAT S
[10]  
Castree N., 2001, SOCIAL NATURE THEORY