The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets

被引:264
作者
Liang, Decui [1 ]
Xu, Zeshui [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 610054, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610065, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Multi-criteria decision making; Hesitant fuzzy sets; Pythagorean fuzzy sets; TOPSIS; LINGUISTIC TERM SETS; SIMILARITY MEASURES; QUALIFLEX APPROACH; MEMBERSHIP GRADES; DISTANCE; RANKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2017.06.034
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs) as a new generalization of fuzzy sets (FSs) can handle uncertain information more flexibly in the process of decision making. In our real life, we also may encounter a hesitant fuzzy environment. In view of the effective tool of hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) for expressing the hesitant situation, we introduce HFSs into PFSs and extend the existing research work of PFSs. Concretely speaking, this paper considers that the membership degree and the non-membership degree of PFSs are expressed as hesitant fuzzy elements. First, we propose a new concept of hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets (HPFSs) by combining PFSs with HFSs. It provides a new semantic interpretation for our evaluation. Meanwhile, the properties and the operators of HPFSs are studied in detail. For the sake of application, we focus on investigating the normalization method and the distance measures of HPFSs in advance. Then, we explore the application of HPFSs to multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) by employing the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method. A new extension of TOPSIS method is further designed in the context of MCDM with HPFSs. Finally, an example of the energy project selection is presented to elaborate on the performance of our approach. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 179
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, J APPL MATH
[2]   INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1986, 20 (01) :87-96
[3]  
Dick S., 2015, IEEE T FUZZY SYST
[4]   Correlation for Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets and Dual Interval-Valued Hesitant Fuzzy Sets [J].
Farhadinia, B. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (02) :184-205
[5]  
Garg H., 2016, INT J INTEL SYST
[6]  
Hwang C-L., 1981, METHODS MULTIPLE ATT, P58, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-48318-93
[7]   Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making [J].
Joshi, Deepa ;
Kumar, Sanjay .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 248 (01) :183-191
[8]   Deriving three-way decisions from intuitionistic fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets [J].
Liang, Decui ;
Liu, Dun .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2015, 300 :28-48
[9]   A Novel Risk Decision Making Based on Decision-Theoretic Rough Sets Under Hesitant Fuzzy Information [J].
Liang, Decui ;
Liu, Dun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 23 (02) :237-247
[10]   Satisfaction Degree Based Interactive Decision Making under Hesitant Fuzzy Environment with Incomplete Weights [J].
Liao, Huchang ;
Xu, Zeshui .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UNCERTAINTY FUZZINESS AND KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2014, 22 (04) :553-572