Subjective Poverty and Its Relation to Objective Poverty Concepts in Hungary

被引:32
作者
Eszter Siposne Nandori
机构
[1] University of Miskolc, Miskolc
关键词
Poverty; Systematic data collection; Hungary; Subjective poverty; Objective poverty; CONSENSUS; HAPPINESS; CONSUMPTION; WELFARE; INCOME;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-010-9743-z
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The paper analyzes subjective poverty in Hungary and compares it to the objective poverty concepts. Subjective poverty is defined by examining who people consider to be poor. Based on the Easterlin paradox, the initial hypothesis states that subjective and absolute poverty concepts are highly correlated. Taking into account that Hungary is a developed country, subjective well-being is supposed to be associated not only with absolute, but also with relative deprivation. The methods of systematic data collection are used to collect data about the belief of the population. The paper concludes that low income level, Roma descent, entitlement to social supports and unemployment are the items thought to be most related to poverty by the informants. It proves that subjective poverty is a multidimensional concept. It also concludes that absolute and relative poverty thresholds coincide with the subjective one. It implies that increasing the absolute income level of individuals may not be enough to improve their subjective wellbeing as they are also concerned with their relative income position.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 556
页数:20
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Survey evidence on wage rigidity and unemployment: Sweden in the 1990s [J].
Agell, J ;
Lundborg, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2003, 105 (01) :15-29
[2]  
Alam A., 2005, Growth, Poverty and Inequality: Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union
[3]  
[Anonymous], SZEGENYSEG TARSADALM
[4]   A NOTE ON MEASURING VEBLEN THEORY OF CONSPICUOUS CONSUMPTION [J].
BASMANN, RL ;
MOLINA, DJ ;
SLOTTJE, DJ .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1988, 70 (03) :531-535
[5]  
Boster James, 1983, Directions in Cognitive Anthropology
[6]   Do you enjoy having more than others? Survey evidence of positional goods [J].
Carlsson, Fredrik ;
Johansson-Stenman, Olof ;
Martinsson, Peter .
ECONOMICA, 2007, 74 (296) :586-598
[7]  
CASTILLA C, 2009, MIDW INT EC DEV C MI
[8]   Relative income, happiness, and utility: An explanation for the Easterlin paradox and other puzzles [J].
Clark, Andrew E. ;
Frijters, Paul ;
Shields, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2008, 46 (01) :95-144
[9]  
deMunck VictorC., 1998, USING METHODS FIELD
[10]   WILL RAISING THE INCOMES OF ALL INCREASE THE HAPPINESS OF ALL [J].
EASTERLIN, RA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1995, 27 (01) :35-47