Interprofessional education in pediatrics-Child protection and family services as a teaching example

被引:12
作者
Straub, Christine [1 ]
Krueger, Marcus [1 ,2 ]
Bode, Sebastian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Dept Gen Pediat Adolescent Med & Neonatol, Ctr Pediat,Med Ctr, Freiburg, Germany
[2] Munich Municipal Hosp, Dept Neonatol, Munich, Germany
关键词
Interprofessional education; Interprofessional collaboration; Child protection; Family services; Pediatrics;
D O I
10.1016/j.aanat.2017.04.003
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
Interprofessional collaboration between different professional groups in the health care system is essential to efficient and effective patient care. Especially in pediatrics, in the field of child protection, and family services it is mandatory to involve experts from different health-care professions to optimize support for children and their families. Interprofessional education in medical schools and specifically in pediatrics is rare in Germany, but is called for by the German National Competence Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM). We developed an interprofessional course aimed at bringing medical students together with students of psychology, social work, clinical education, and educational science to learn from, about and with each other in the context of child protection and family services. This offers opportunities for all participants to understand profession-specific competencies, roles, attitudes, and limits of their professional roles. The course is led by an interprofessional teaching tandem (social scientist & physician); further input is provided by other health and social care professionals. After the students get a brief overview about the requirements for a successful interprofessional cooperation they solve case studies in interprofessional teams with online support by the teaching tandem. We assess the feasibility and acceptability of this interprofessional course and describe challenges encountered when conducting this kind of learning concept for health care professions. All conducted courses over five consecutive terms were evaluated with an arithmetic mean of AM = 1.32 on a 6-point scale (1= "excellent", 6 = "insufficient"), the teaching tandem was evaluated with AM =1.1. All participants (N = 85 complete evaluations) voted for the course to be continued in the following terms. Especially the opportunity to discuss cases with students from different degree programs was highly valued as were interprofessional discussions and more in-depth understanding of other professions' competencies and roles. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2011, COR COMP INT COLL PR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, QUALITATIVE CONTENT
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, IBM SPSS STAT MAC
  • [4] State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback
    Archer, Julian C.
    [J]. MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [5] Burgi H, 2008, JOINT C SWISS MED FA
  • [6] Frank JR., 2005, CANMEDS 2005 PHYS CO, V1st ed., P40
  • [7] Freeth D, 2005, PROMOT PARTNER HEAL, P1, DOI 10.1109/OCEANS.2005.1639732
  • [8] Frohlich-Gildhoff K, 2011, COMPETENCE ORIENTATI
  • [9] German Council of Science and Humanities, 2012, REC AC TEACH QUAL HL
  • [10] German expert council for the assessment of the advancement in the health care system, 2007, COOP RESP COND GOAL