On the importance of the Pearson correlation coefficient in noise reduction

被引:269
|
作者
Benesty, Jacob
Chen, Jingdong [1 ]
Huang, Yiteng [2 ]
机构
[1] Bell Labs, Murray Hill, NJ 07974 USA
[2] WeVoice Inc, Bridgewater, NJ 08807 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING | 2008年 / 16卷 / 04期
关键词
mean-square error (MSE); noise reduction; Pearson correlation coefficient; speech distortion; speech enhancement; Wiener filter;
D O I
10.1109/TASL.2008.919072
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Noise reduction, which aims at estimating a clean speech from noisy observations, has attracted a considerable amount of research and engineering attention over the past few decades. In the single-channel scenario, an estimate of the clean speech can be obtained by passing the noisy signal picked up by the microphone through a linear filter/transformation. The core issue, then, is how to find an optimal filter/transformation such that, after the filtering process, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is improved but the desired speech signal is not noticeably distorted. Most of the existing optimal filters (such as the Wiener filter and subspace transformation) are formulated from the mean-square error (MSE) criterion. However, with the MSE formulation, many desired properties of the optimal noise-reduction filters such as the SNR behavior cannot be seen. In this paper, we present a new criterion based on the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). We show that in the context of noise reduction the squared PCC (SPCC) has many appealing properties and. can be used as an optimization cost function to derive many optimal and suboptimal noise-reduction filters. The clear advantage of using the SPCC over the MSE is that the noise-reduction performance (in terms of the SNR improvement and speech distortion) of the resulting optimal filters can be easily analyzed. This shows that, as far as noise reduction is concerned, the SPCC-based cost function serves as a more natural criterion to optimize as compared to the MSE.
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 765
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EXAMPLES OF OPTIMAL NOISE REDUCTION FILTERS DERIVED FROM THE SQUARED PEARSON CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
    Yu, Jiaolong
    Benesty, Jacob
    Huang, Gongping
    Chen, Jingdong
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2014,
  • [2] OPTIMA L SINGLE-CHANNEL NOISE REDUCTION FILTERING MATRICES FROM THE PEARSON CORRELATION COEFFICIENT PERSPECTIVE
    Yu, Jiaolong
    Benesty, Jacob
    Huang, Gongping
    Chen, Jingdong
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP), 2015, : 201 - 205
  • [3] Pearson's correlation coefficient
    Sedgwick, Philip
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
  • [4] Pearson's correlation coefficient
    Williams, S
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 109 (1015) : 38 - 38
  • [5] A DATA SHEET FOR THE PEARSON CORRELATION COEFFICIENT
    Thurstone, L. L.
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1922, 6 (01): : 49 - 56
  • [6] Regression models of Pearson correlation coefficient
    Dufera, Abdisa G.
    Liu, Tiantian
    Xu, Jin
    STATISTICAL THEORY AND RELATED FIELDS, 2023, 7 (02) : 97 - 106
  • [7] A Pearson correlation coefficient improved by spatial weight
    Han S.
    Han J.
    Zhao X.
    Wang X.
    Fan L.
    Mei J.
    Shiyou Diqiu Wuli Kantan/Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2019, 54 (06): : 1363 - 1370
  • [8] A Machine Method of Calculating the Pearson Correlation Coefficient
    Edgerton, Harold A.
    EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH BULLETIN, 1931, 10 (01): : 26 - 26
  • [9] Should Pearson's correlation coefficient be avoided?
    Armstrong, Richard A.
    OPHTHALMIC AND PHYSIOLOGICAL OPTICS, 2019, 39 (05) : 316 - 327
  • [10] Analytic posteriors for Pearson's correlation coefficient
    Ly, Alexander
    Marsman, Maarten
    Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan
    STATISTICA NEERLANDICA, 2018, 72 (01) : 4 - 13