Managing trade-offs in 'ecotopia': becoming green at the Centre for Alternative Technology

被引:7
作者
Anderson, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch City & Reg Planning, Cardiff CF10 3WA, S Glam, Wales
关键词
environmentalism; sustainability; individual identity; Centre for Alternative Technology; practice; citizen-consumer; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; POLITICS; CONSUMPTION; IDENTITY; CITIZENS; TENSIONS; SPACES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00456.x
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The individual has been cast as both the source of and solution to many contemporary environmental problems. Although some individuals may display concern for the environment, actions are undertaken within a societal context that is often ambivalent to environmental issues. To become green, therefore, individuals have to negotiate a range of trade-offs between their environmental aspirations and the realities of life in a developed, consumer-based society. This paper draws on extensive field work at one site at which individuals have explicitly sought to manage these trade-offs the Centre for Alternative Technology, Wales, UK. It argues that two distinct strategies are adopted to manage the tensions involved in becoming green: a strategy of segregation where professional practices are separated from personal actions to establish balance, if not consistency, in everyday life; and a strategy of alignment where (unsuccessful) attempts are made to unify personal and professional practices in line with environmental ideals. This paper outlines how the inability of these strategies to fully reconcile the tensions involved in becoming green has led to a politics of pragmatism within environmental practice. It argues that this politics offers a way forward for contemporary environmentalism, both within ecotopian spaces such as the Centre for Alternative Technology, but also in more mainstream spaces where the majority live their lives.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 225
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
[21]  
Barr S, 2006, GEOGRAPHY, V91, P43
[22]   A conceptual framework for understanding and analysing attitudes towards household-waste management [J].
Barr, S ;
Gilg, AW ;
Ford, NJ .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A, 2001, 33 (11) :2025-2048
[23]  
Beck U., 1992, RISK SOC NEW MODERNI
[24]  
Beck Ulrich., 2001, EDGE, P164
[25]  
Blake J., 1999, Local Environ., P257, DOI [10.1080/13549839908725599, DOI 10.1080/13549839908725599]
[26]   Eco-politics beyond the paradigm of sustainability:: A conceptual framework and research agenda [J].
Bluhdorn, Ingolfur ;
Welsh, Ian .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2007, 16 (02) :185-205
[27]   Crossing the threshold: municipal waste policy and household waste generation [J].
Bulkeley, Harriet ;
Gregson, Nicky .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2009, 41 (04) :929-945
[28]   The sociology of the self [J].
Callero, PL .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2003, 29 :115-133
[30]  
Cherrier H, 2002, ADV CONSUM RES, V29, P245