Complications after ERCP in liver transplant recipients

被引:50
作者
Balderramo, Domingo [1 ]
Bordas, Josep M. [1 ]
Sendino, Oriol [1 ]
Abraldes, Juan G. [2 ]
Navasa, Miguel [2 ]
Llach, Josep [1 ]
Cardenas, Andres [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Inst Malal Digest & Metab, Hosp Clin, GI Endoscopy Unit, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Inst Malal Digest & Metab, Hosp Clin, Liver Unit, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
ANASTOMOTIC BILIARY STRICTURES; MAXIMAL STENT THERAPY; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; ADULT LIVING-DONOR; ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT; PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER; RISK-FACTORS; INCIDENCE RATES; PANCREATITIS; SPHINCTEROTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.025
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Complications of the biliary tract after liver transplantation are successfully managed with ERCP; however, the incidence and risk factors for post-ERCP complications remain unknown. Objective: To examine the incidence, risk factors, and short-term outcome of post-ERCP complications in liver transplant (LT) recipients. Design: Retrospective evaluation of all ERCPs performed in LT recipients at our institution during a 7-year, 4-month period. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: A total of 243 ERCPs performed in 121 LT recipients with duct-to-duct anastomosis. Main Outcome Measurements: Incidence of post-ERCP complications. Predictive factors were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Overall complications occurred in 22 procedures (9%) (13 mild, 9 moderate): pancreatitis in 9 patients (3.7%), cholangitis in 8 patients (3.3%), postsphincterotomy bleeding in 4 patients (1.6%), and subcapsular hematoma in 1 patient (0.4%). The mean hospitalization for post-ERCP complications was 4.8 days (range 2-11 days). Logistic regression identified mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (odds ratio [OR], 4.65; 95% CI, 1.01-21.81; P = .049), serum creatinine level greater than 2 mg/dL (OR, 4.17; 95% CI, 1.07-16.26; P = .04), biliary sphincterotomy (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.07-8.53; P = .037), and more than 2 pancreatic duct contrast injections (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.10-7.91; P = .032) as independent risk factors for post-ERCP complications, whereas steroid therapy (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.08-0.63; P = .004) was an independent protective factor. Limitations: Single-center retrospective study. Conclusions: The rate of complications after ERCP in LT recipients seems to be similar to that of non-LT recipients. Complications in this analysis were more common in LT recipients receiving mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors and those with renal failure, biliary sphincterotomy, and more than 2 pancreatic duct injections, whereas they were less common in those patients on steroid therapy. (Gastrointest Endosc 2011;74:285-94.)
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 294
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: A systematic survey of prospective studies [J].
Andriulli, Angelo ;
Loperfido, Silvano ;
Napolitano, Grazia ;
Niro, Grazia ;
Valvano, Maria Rosa ;
Spirito, Fulvio ;
Pilotto, Alberto ;
Forlano, Rosario .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (08) :1781-1788
[2]   Biliary Complications Following Liver Transplantation [J].
Ayoub, Walid S. ;
Esquivel, Carlos O. ;
Martin, Paul .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2010, 55 (06) :1540-1546
[3]   Prophylactic corticosteroids do not prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Bai, Yu ;
Gao, Jun ;
Shi, Xingang ;
Zou, Duowu ;
Li, Zhaoshen .
PANCREATOLOGY, 2008, 8 (4-5) :504-509
[4]   Biliary strictures after liver transplantation. Predictive factors for response to endoscopic management and long-term outcome [J].
Barriga, Jose ;
Thompson, Roy ;
Shokouh-Amiri, Hosein ;
Davila, Rena ;
Ismail, Mohammad K. ;
Waters, Bradford ;
Tombazzi, Claudio R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 335 (06) :439-443
[5]   Breaking down barriers: Helpful breakthrough statistical methods you need to understand better [J].
Blackstone, EH .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 122 (03) :430-439
[6]   Acute pancreatitis in peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis: risk, clinical course, outcome, and possible aetiology [J].
Bruno, MJ ;
van Westerloo, DJ ;
van Dorp, WT ;
Dekker, W ;
Ferwerda, J ;
Tytgat, GNJ ;
Schut, NH .
GUT, 2000, 46 (03) :385-389
[7]   Complications of ERCP: a prospective study [J].
Christensen, M ;
Matzen, P ;
Schulze, S ;
Rosenberg, J .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 60 (05) :721-731
[8]   ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY COMPLICATIONS AND THEIR MANAGEMENT - AN ATTEMPT AT CONSENSUS [J].
COTTON, PB ;
LEHMAN, G ;
VENNES, J ;
GEENEN, JE ;
RUSSELL, RCG ;
MEYERS, WC ;
LIGUORY, C ;
NICKL, N .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1991, 37 (03) :383-393
[9]   A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop [J].
Cotton, Peter B. ;
Eisen, Glenn M. ;
Aabakken, Lars ;
Baron, Todd H. ;
Hutter, Matt M. ;
Jacobson, Brian C. ;
Mergener, Klaus ;
Nemcek, Albert, Jr. ;
Petersen, Bret T. ;
Petrini, John L. ;
Pike, Irving M. ;
Rabeneck, Linda ;
Romagnuolo, Joseph ;
Vargo, John J. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (03) :446-454
[10]   Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years [J].
Cotton, Peter B. ;
Garrow, Donald A. ;
Gallagher, Joseph ;
Romagnuolo, Joseph .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 70 (01) :80-88