Couple Communication in Cancer: Protocol for a Multi-Method Examination

被引:12
作者
Langer, Shelby L. [1 ]
Romano, Joan M. [2 ]
Keefe, Francis [3 ]
Baucom, Donald H. [4 ]
Strauman, Timothy [5 ]
Syrjala, Karen L. [6 ]
Bolger, Niall [7 ]
Burns, John [8 ]
Bricker, Jonathan B. [9 ,10 ]
Todd, Michael [11 ]
Baucom, Brian R. W. [12 ]
Fischer, Melanie S. [13 ]
Ghosh, Neeta [6 ]
Gralow, Julie [14 ]
Shankaran, Veena [14 ]
Zafar, S. Yousuf [15 ]
Westbrook, Kelly [15 ]
Leo, Karena [3 ]
Ramos, Katherine [3 ]
Weber, Danielle M. [4 ]
Porter, Laura S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Edson Coll Nursing & Hlth Innovat, Ctr Hlth Promot & Dis Prevent, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[5] Duke Univ, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Durham, NC USA
[6] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Clin Res Div, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[7] Columbia Univ, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10027 USA
[8] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[9] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Publ Hlth Sci Div, 1124 Columbia St, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[10] Univ Washington, Dept Psychol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[11] Arizona State Univ, Edson Coll Nursing & Hlth Innovat, Phoenix, AZ USA
[12] Univ Utah, Dept Psychol, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[13] Heidelberg Univ, Univ Hosp Heidelberg, Inst Med Psychol, Heidelberg, Germany
[14] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Div Med Oncol, Seattle, WA USA
[15] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
cancer; couples; adjustment; cognitive processing; intimacy; distress; relationship adjustment; SOCIAL CONSTRAINTS; BREAST-CANCER; PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS; EMOTIONAL EXPRESSIVITY; PARENTING CONCERNS; WORKING MODELS; EVENT SCALE; SUPPORT; INTIMACY; WOMEN;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769407
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Cancer and its treatment pose challenges that affect not only patients but also their significant others, including intimate partners. Accumulating evidence suggests that couples' ability to communicate effectively plays a major role in the psychological adjustment of both individuals and the quality of their relationship. Two key conceptual models have been proposed to account for how couple communication impacts psychological and relationship adjustment: the social-cognitive processing (SCP) model and the relationship intimacy (RI) model. These models posit different mechanisms and outcomes, and thus have different implications for intervention. The purpose of this project is to test and compare the utility of these models using comprehensive and methodologically rigorous methods. Aims are: (1) to examine the overall fit of the SCP and RI models in explaining patient and partner psychological and relationship adjustment as they occur on a day-to-day basis and over the course of 1 year; (2) to examine the fit of the models for different subgroups (males vs. females, and patients vs. partners); and (3) to examine the utility of various methods of assessing communication by examining the degree to which baseline indices from different measurement strategies predict self-reported adjustment at 1-year follow up. The study employs a longitudinal, multi-method approach to examining communication processes including: standard self-report questionnaires assessing process and outcome variables collected quarterly over the course of 1 year; smartphone-based ecological momentary assessments to sample participant reports in real time; and laboratory-based couple conversations from which we derive observational measures of communicative behavior and affective expression, as well as vocal indices of emotional arousal. Participants are patients with stage II-IV breast, colon, rectal, or lung cancer and their spouses/partners, recruited from two NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers. Results will be published in scientific journals, presented at scientific conferences, and conveyed to a larger audience through infographics and social media outlets. Findings will inform theory, measurement, and the design and implementation of efficacious interventions aimed at optimizing both patient and partner well-being.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   A meta-analysis of the relationship between social constraints and distress in cancer patients [J].
Adams, Rebecca N. ;
Winger, Joseph G. ;
Mosher, Catherine E. .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2015, 38 (02) :294-305
[2]   Physical activity, long-term symptoms, and physical health-related quality of life among breast cancer survivors: A prospective analysis [J].
Alfano C.M. ;
Smith A.W. ;
Irwin M.L. ;
Bowen D.J. ;
Sorensen B. ;
Reeve B.B. ;
Meeske K.A. ;
Bernstein L. ;
Baumgartner K.B. ;
Ballard-Barbash R. ;
Malone K.E. ;
McTiernan A. .
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2007, 1 (2) :116-128
[3]   SCREENING FOR DEPRESSION IN WELL OLDER ADULTS - EVALUATION OF A SHORT-FORM OF THE CES-D [J].
ANDRESEN, EM ;
MALMGREN, JA ;
CARTER, WB ;
PATRICK, DL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1994, 10 (02) :77-84
[4]   Patients' psychosocial concerns following stem cell transplantation [J].
Andrykowski, MA ;
Cordova, MJ ;
Hann, DM ;
Jacobsen, PB ;
Fields, KK ;
Phillips, G .
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 24 (10) :1121-1129
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Cancer care for the whole patient: Meeting the psychosocial and physical needs of all cancer patients
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Praat: doing phonetics by computer computer program
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Stata statistical software: Release 17
[9]   Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors [J].
Areia, Neide P. ;
Fonseca, Gabriela ;
Major, Sofia ;
Relvas, Ana P. .
PALLIATIVE & SUPPORTIVE CARE, 2019, 17 (03) :286-293
[10]   Advances in Bayesian model fit evaluation for structural equation models [J].
Asparouhov, Tihomir ;
Muthen, Bengt .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2021, 28 (01) :1-14