The choice of ownership structure: Evidence from Russian mass privatization

被引:10
作者
Sprenger, Carsten [1 ]
机构
[1] ICEF, Higher Sch Econ, Moscow 109028, Russia
关键词
Privatization; Ownership structure; Insider ownership; Russia; Tobit model with sample selection; CORPORATE-OWNERSHIP; PERFORMANCE; FIRMS; DETERMINANTS; TRANSITION; OLIGARCHS; DYNAMICS; HUNGARY; ROMANIA; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jce.2010.09.003
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Sprenger, Carsten-The choice of ownership structure: Evidence from Russian mass privatization We use a large data set of Russian manufacturing firms to describe the ownership structure in the Russian industry at the end of the mass privatization program in 1994 and its subsequent evolution. The data shows a high, but gradually decreasing ownership stakes of firm insiders (managers and workers). We estimate the effect of a wide range of firm characteristics on the decision to privatize, the initial ownership structure after privatization, and on subsequent changes of ownership stakes. We test and find support for several predictions of the model by Aghion and Blanchard (1998). For example, collusion among workers makes them more reluctant to sell shares to outsiders. Firms in financial distress show a higher incidence of insiders selecting the option of privatization leading to high insider ownership. This can be explained by their desire to insure against unemployment in the case of restructuring by outsiders. No evidence is found of a sequencing in privatization according to the performance of firms before privatization. A methodological novelty of this paper is the application of a tobit model with sample selection to the choice of ownership stakes. Journal of Comparative Economics xxx (xx) (2011) xxx-xxx. International College of Economics and Finance (ICEF), Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation. (C) 2010 Association for Comparative Economic Studies Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 277
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] LARGE SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM, RISK SHARING, AND FINANCIAL MARKET EQUILIBRIUM
    ADMATI, AR
    PFLEIDERER, P
    ZECHNER, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1994, 102 (06) : 1097 - 1130
  • [2] On privatization methods in Eastern Europe and their implications
    Aghion, P
    Blanchard, OJ
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF TRANSITION, 1998, 6 (01) : 87 - 99
  • [3] [Anonymous], 63 EBRD
  • [4] [Anonymous], 4811 WORLD BANK
  • [5] How does privatization work? Evidence from the Russian shops
    Barberis, N
    Boycko, M
    Shleifer, A
    Tsukanova, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1996, 104 (04) : 764 - 790
  • [6] Bishop Kate., 2002, ACTA OECON, V52, P443
  • [7] Russian privatization and corporate governance: What went wrong?
    Black, B
    Kraakman, R
    Tarassova, A
    [J]. STANFORD LAW REVIEW, 2000, 52 (06) : 1731 - 1808
  • [8] Blasi J., 1997, KREMLIN CAPITALISM P
  • [9] Boycko M., 1995, PRIVATIZING RUSSIA
  • [10] Employment and Wage Effects of Privatisation: Evidence from Hungary, Romania, Russia and Ukraine*
    Brown, J. David
    Earle, John S.
    Telegdy, Almos
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2010, 120 (545) : 683 - 708