Action research for innovation management: three benefits, three challenges, and three spaces

被引:37
作者
Ollila, Susanne [1 ]
Ystrom, Anna [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Technol Management & Econ, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
PERSPECTIVES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1111/radm.12407
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Given that the innovation landscape is changing, and new forms of organization and management are emerging, this study discusses the potential benefits of action research for innovation management (IM) as it provides closeness to living emergent systems, generates rich insights as well as knowledge for both rigorous theory development and change in practice. Drawing from a large-scale action research study involving a complex collaborative organizational construct, we outline three challenges from employing action research: the process is both reflexive and progressive, the researcher is both an outsider and an insider, and the outcome is both general and specific. A model of three social spaces (the action research space, the academic space, and the practitioner space) is proposed to address the challenges and assist in navigating the multitude of processes, roles, and outcomes associated with action research. The study argues that action research for IM is well suited to exploring tacit aspects of practices and processes in the emergent or shifting study contexts to transform practices through interventions. Thus, if implemented carefully by experienced researchers, it can provide valuable data that are indispensable for theory development in the field of IM.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 411
页数:16
相关论文
共 76 条
[31]   Perspectives on Innovation Processes [J].
Garud, Raghu ;
Tuertscher, Philipp ;
Van De Ven, Andrew H. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2013, 7 (01) :775-819
[32]   Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research: Notes on the Gioia Methodology [J].
Gioia, Dennis A. ;
Corley, Kevin G. ;
Hamilton, Aimee L. .
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 2013, 16 (01) :15-31
[33]  
Glaser B. G., 1967, DISCOV GROUNDED THEO
[34]   Perspective: State-of-the-Art: The Quality of Case Study Research in Innovation Management [J].
Goffin, Keith ;
Ahlstrom, Par ;
Bianchi, Mattia ;
Richtner, Anders .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 36 (05) :586-615
[35]  
Gummesson E., 2000, QUALITATIVE METHODS, V2nd
[36]  
Hall, 1981, CONVERGENCE, V14, P6
[37]  
Hammersley Martyn., 1983, ETHNOGRAPHY PRINCIPL
[38]  
Hansen H.P., 2016, COMMONS SUSTAINABILI
[39]  
Heron J., 1981, HUMAN INQUIRY SOURCE
[40]   Bridging the Rigour-Relevance Gap in Management Research: It's Already Happening! [J].
Hodgkinson, Gerard P. ;
Rousseau, Denise M. .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2009, 46 (03) :534-546