Uncertainty analysis and estimation of robust AIREBO parameters for graphene

被引:51
作者
Dhaliwal, Gurjot [1 ]
Nair, Prasanth B. [2 ]
Singh, Chandra Veer [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 3G8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Inst Aerosp Studies, Toronto, ON M3H 5T6, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Mat Sci & Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 3E4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS; BAYESIAN-INFERENCE; QUANTIFICATION; CALIBRATION; RELAXATION; SIMULATION; CONSTANTS; GRAPHITE; CARBON;
D O I
10.1016/j.carbon.2018.10.020
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
AIREBO is one of the commonly utilized interatomic potential (IP) for performing molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of graphene and carbon nanostructures. With its parameters fitted to a limited dataset, property prediction outside of the original training set can be challenging and can lead to uncertainty in the predicted values. This is especially important for 2D materials such as graphene which have limited experimental data and have widely varying predicted properties in the literature. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) analysis of AIREBO potential parameters and their corresponding effect on the predicted properties of graphene. We found that computed output properties were highly sensitive to small variations in IP parameters. For instance, a 0.5% change in IP parameters led to a 66% change in the predicted elastic constants. Based on our UQ analysis, we developed a new robust IP parameter set for the AIREBO potential with significantly reduced sensitivity towards output properties. The robust parameters were derived using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo scheme, considering gaussian noise in available DFT data. We were also able to obtain realistic error bars on MD predictions by using posterior probability distributions and propagating the underlying variance to the final properties. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:300 / 310
页数:11
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Honeycomb Carbon: A Review of Graphene [J].
Allen, Matthew J. ;
Tung, Vincent C. ;
Kaner, Richard B. .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2010, 110 (01) :132-145
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GAUSSIAN PROCESS FRA
[3]  
[Anonymous], USSR COMPUT MATH MAT
[4]  
Banhart F, 2011, ACS NANO, V5, P26, DOI [10.1021/nn102598m, 10.1016/B978-0-08-102053-1.00005-3]
[5]   LATTICE CONSTANTS OF GRAPHITE AT LOW TEMPERATURES [J].
BASKIN, Y ;
MEYER, L .
PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1955, 100 (02) :544-544
[6]   Implications of the choice of interatomic potential on calculated planar faults and surface properties in nickel [J].
Becker, C. A. ;
Tavazza, F. ;
Levine, L. E. .
PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE, 2011, 91 (27) :3578-3597
[7]   Considerations for choosing and using force fields and interatomic potentials in materials science and engineering [J].
Becker, Chandler A. ;
Tavazza, Francesca ;
Trautt, Zachary T. ;
de Macedo, Robert A. Buarque .
CURRENT OPINION IN SOLID STATE & MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2013, 17 (06) :277-283
[8]  
Behera H, 2010, AIP CONF PROC, V1313, P152, DOI 10.1063/1.3530474
[9]   A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energy expression for hydrocarbons [J].
Brenner, DW ;
Shenderova, OA ;
Harrison, JA ;
Stuart, SJ ;
Ni, B ;
Sinnott, SB .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2002, 14 (04) :783-802
[10]   Calibration of Forcefields for Molecular Simulation: Sequential Design of Computer Experiments for Building Cost-Efficient Kriging Metamodels [J].
Cailliez, Fabien ;
Bourasseau, Arnaud ;
Pernot, Pascal .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 2014, 35 (02) :130-149