Grassland ecosystem services: a systematic review of research advances and future directions

被引:243
|
作者
Zhao, Yuanyuan [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Zhifeng [3 ,4 ]
Wu, Jianguo [3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Soil & Water Conservat, Yanchi Res Stn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Forestry Univ, Key Lab, State Forestry Adm Soil & Water Conservat, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Normal Univ, Ctr Human Environm Syst Sustainabil, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Normal Univ, Fac Geog Sci, Sch Nat Resources, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[5] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[6] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Grassland ecosystem services; Systematic review; Provisioning services; Regulating services; Cultural services; Grassland sustainability; SOIL ORGANIC-CARBON; SCALE WIND EROSION; LAND-USE CHANGE; TRADE-OFFS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LOESS PLATEAU; BIOENERGY PRODUCTION; LANDSCAPE PATTERN; SPECIES RICHNESS; ALPINE GRASSLAND;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-020-00980-3
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Grasslands provide a variety of ecosystem services (ESs) for humans. While much ES research has focused on forests and wetlands, synthesizing the currently somewhat sporadic studies of grassland ecosystem services (GESs) is much needed. Objectives We aimed to review the scope, major methods, and key findings of GESs, and identify knowledge gaps and future directions. Methods We conducted a systematic review of articles published during 1970-2018 (including 380 peer-reviewed articles from Web of Science and 32 book chapters from Google Scholar). Results The number of GES studies has accelerated in recent decades, with China (31%) and the United States (18%) together accounting for almost half of them. A total of 33 GESs were mentioned in the searched articles, of which carbon sequestration, forage production, and water erosion control had the highest frequencies. Methods for evaluating GESs include field survey, field experiments, and statistical and process-based modeling. Grasslands are the primary source of meat and dairy products, account for about one-third of the total carbon of all terrestrial ecosystems, and provide numerous other ESs, such as night cooling, soil erosion control, and flood mitigation. Conclusions This review presents the state-of-the-science of GESs, and identifies several future research directions. To move forward, we propose a framework with a 3-M methodology: (1) "Multi-scales"-understanding GESs from various spatiotemporal scales; (2) "Multi-methods"-evaluating GESs with multiple statistical and modeling techniques using multiple data sources; and (3) "Multi-perspectives"-assessing GESs from ecological, social, and economic perspectives for sustainability.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / 814
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] After-sales services and aftermarket support: a systematic review, theory and future research directions
    Durugbo, Christopher M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2020, 58 (06) : 1857 - 1892
  • [12] Zombie firms: a systematic review and future research directions
    Shome, Samik
    Verma, Sushma
    MANAGEMENT REVIEW QUARTERLY, 2024,
  • [13] Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions
    Ricarda B. Bouncken
    Johanna Gast
    Sascha Kraus
    Marcel Bogers
    Review of Managerial Science, 2015, 9 : 577 - 601
  • [14] Alliance capabilities: A systematic review and future research directions
    Kohtamaki, Marko
    Rabetino, Rodrigo
    Moller, Kristian
    INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 68 : 188 - 201
  • [15] Microfinance governance: a systematic review and future research directions
    Rasel, Md. Ali
    Win, Sandar
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2020, 47 (07) : 1811 - 1847
  • [16] Strategic flexibility: a systematic review and future research directions
    Chanphati, Jitrinee
    Thosuwanchot, Nongnapat
    JOURNAL OF STRATEGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 16 (03) : 470 - 491
  • [17] Coopetition: a systematic review, synthesis, and future research directions
    Bouncken, Ricarda B.
    Gast, Johanna
    Kraus, Sascha
    Bogers, Marcel
    REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 9 (03) : 577 - 601
  • [18] The Enneagram: A systematic review of the literature and directions for future research
    Hook, Joshua N.
    Hall, Todd W.
    Davis, Don E.
    Van Tongeren, Daryl R.
    Conner, Mackenzie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 77 (04) : 865 - 883
  • [19] Motherhood and consumption: A systematic review and directions for future research
    Freitas, Thalita Meyli Lin
    Leite, Ramon Silva
    Pinto, Marcelo de Rezende
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2024, 48 (04)
  • [20] Gamification for HRD: Systematic Review and Future Research Directions
    Thomas, Nibu John
    Baral, Rupashree
    Crocco, Oliver S.
    HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2022, 21 (02) : 198 - 224