Collecting patient-reported outcome measures

被引:36
作者
Ahern, Susannah [1 ]
Ruseckaite, Rasa [1 ]
Ackerman, Ilana N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
quality; patient; outcomes; health services;
D O I
10.1111/imj.13633
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) are potentially useful outcome measures that may be reported at the individual clinical, health service and/or health system level. PROM require clearly defined patient populations to enable comparisons, and are most meaningful when integrated with clinical data sets. Where possible PROM should be measured pre- and post-intervention using reliable and validated tools. A variety of PROM collection methods exist which each have strengths and limitations, with selection depending on their purpose and patient factors. PROM programmes should be developed with high levels of clinician support and patient input to maximise collection of clinically relevant information.
引用
收藏
页码:1454 / 1457
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] The changing landscape of patient outcome assessment
    Ackerman, Ilana N.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2017, 63 (01) : 1 - 3
  • [2] [Anonymous], STAND SETS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, US GUID IMPL PAT REP
  • [4] Adverse Symptom Event Reporting by Patients vs Clinicians: Relationships With Clinical Outcomes
    Basch, Ethan
    Jia, Xiaoyu
    Heller, Glenn
    Barz, Allison
    Sit, Laura
    Fruscione, Michael
    Appawu, Mark
    Iasonos, Alexia
    Atkinson, Thomas
    Goldfarb, Shari
    Culkin, Ann
    Kris, Mark G.
    Schrag, Deborah
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (23): : 1624 - 1632
  • [5] Should we all go to the PROM? The first two years of the British Spine Registry
    Breakwell, L. M.
    Cole, A. A.
    Birch, N.
    Heywood, C.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (07) : 871 - 874
  • [6] Engaging Patients as Partners in Developing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cancer-A Review of the Literature
    Camuso, Natasha
    Bajaj, Prerna
    Dudgeon, Deborah
    Mitera, Gunita
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2016, 24 (08) : 3543 - 3549
  • [7] Overview of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory for the Quantitative Assessment of Items in Developing Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Comment
    Cappelleri, Joseph C.
    Lundy, J. Jason
    Hays, Ron D.
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2014, 36 (05) : 648 - 662
  • [8] Establishing a population-based patient-reported outcomes study (PROMs) using national cancer registries across two jurisdictions: the Prostate Cancer Treatment, your experience (PiCTure) study
    Drummond, F. J.
    Kinnear, H.
    Donnelly, C.
    O'Leary, E.
    O'Brien, K.
    Burns, R. M.
    Gavin, A.
    Sharp, L.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2015, 5 (04):
  • [9] Overcoming barriers to the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: the PROMOTION Registry
    Efficace, Fabio
    Rees, Jonathan
    Fayers, Peter
    Pusic, Andrea
    Taphoorn, Martin
    Greimel, Elfriede
    Reijneveld, Jaap
    Whale, Katie
    Blazeby, Jane
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2014, 12
  • [10] Addressing Missing Data in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS): Implications for the Use of PROMS for Comparing Provider Performance
    Gomes, Manuel
    Gutacker, Nils
    Bojke, Chris
    Street, Andrew
    [J]. HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2016, 25 (05) : 515 - 528