Evaluating and monitoring analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit

被引:155
作者
Sessler, Curtis N. [1 ,2 ]
Grap, Mary Jo [3 ]
Ramsay, Michael A. E. [4 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ Hlth Syst, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Dept Med, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[2] Virginia Hosp, Coll Med, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[3] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Sch Nursing, Dept Adult Hlth Nursing, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
[4] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2008年 / 12卷 / Suppl 3期
关键词
D O I
10.1186/cc6148
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Management of analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit requires evaluation and monitoring of key parameters in order to detect and quantify pain and agitation, and to quantify sedation. The routine use of subjective scales for pain, agitation, and sedation promotes more effective management, including patient-focused titration of medications to specific end-points. The need for frequent measurement reflects the dynamic nature of pain, agitation, and sedation, which change constantly in critically ill patients. Further, close monitoring promotes repeated evaluation of response to therapy, thus helping to avoid over-sedation and to eliminate pain and agitation. Pain assessment tools include self-report (often using a numeric pain scale) for communicative patients and pain scales that incorporate observed behaviors and physiologic measures for noncommunicative patients. Some of these tools have undergone validity testing but more work is needed. Sedation-agitation scales can be used to identify and quantify agitation, and to grade the depth of sedation. Some scales incorporate a step-wise assessment of response to increasingly noxious stimuli and a brief assessment of cognition to define levels of consciousness; these tools can often be quickly performed and easily recalled. Many of the sedation-agitation scales have been extensively tested for inter-rater reliability and validated against a variety of parameters. Objective measurement of indicators of consciousness and brain function, such as with processed electroencephalography signals, holds considerable promise, but has not achieved widespread implementation. Further clarification of the roles of these tools, particularly within the context of patient safety, is needed, as is further technology development to eliminate artifacts and investigation to demonstrate added value.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] *AC PAIN MAN GUID, 1992, ACHPR PUBL
  • [2] ASSESSING DISTRESS IN PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE ENVIRONMENTS - THE COMFORT SCALE
    AMBUEL, B
    HAMLETT, KW
    MARX, CM
    BLUMER, JL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 17 (01) : 95 - 109
  • [3] Correlation between AAI™-index and the BIS-index during propofol hypnosis: A clinical study
    Anderson R.E.
    Barr G.
    Jakobsson J.G.
    [J]. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2002, Kluwer Academic Publishers (17) : 325 - 329
  • [4] An application of pain rating scales in geriatric patients
    Bergh, I
    Sjöström, B
    Odén, A
    Steen, B
    [J]. AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 12 (05) : 380 - 387
  • [5] Botha J, 2005, Crit Care Resusc, V7, P92
  • [6] Botha J A, 2004, Crit Care Resusc, V6, P253
  • [7] Confirming the reliability of the sedation-agitation scale administered by ICU nurses without experience in its use
    Brandl, KM
    Langley, KA
    Riker, RR
    Dork, LA
    Qualls, CR
    Levy, H
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2001, 21 (04): : 431 - 436
  • [8] Correlation of approximate entropy, bispectral index, and spectral edge frequency 95 (SEF95) with clinical signs of "anesthetic depth" during coadministration of propofol and remifentanil
    Bruhn, J
    Bouillon, TW
    Radulescu, L
    Hoeft, A
    Bertaccini, E
    Shafer, SL
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2003, 98 (03) : 621 - 627
  • [9] Accidental removal of endotracheal and nasogastric tubes and intravascular catheters
    Carrión, MI
    Ayuso, D
    Marcos, M
    Robles, MP
    de la Cal, MA
    Alía, I
    Esteban, A
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2000, 28 (01) : 63 - 66
  • [10] Agreement between percentage pain reductions calculated from numeric rating scores of pain intensity and those reported by patients with acute or cancer pain
    Cepeda, MS
    Africano, JM
    Polo, R
    Alcala, R
    Carr, DB
    [J]. PAIN, 2003, 106 (03) : 439 - 442