Determining retrofit technologies for building energy performance

被引:27
作者
Benzar, Bianca-Elena [1 ]
Park, Moonseo [2 ]
Lee, Hyun-Soo [2 ]
Yoon, Inseok [2 ]
Cho, Jongwoo [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Architecture & Architectural Engn, 39-425,Gwanak Ro 1, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Architecture & Architectural Engn, Inst Construct & Environm Engn, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Sustainable retrofit; energy efficiency; stakeholders; energy performance certificate; quality function deployment; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS; DECISION-MAKING; GREEN RETROFIT; CONSTRUCTION; RENOVATION; SYSTEM; MODEL; STRATEGIES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1080/13467581.2020.1748037
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Worldwide, the building sector is responsible for consuming more than 36% of the final global energy and produces 39% of carbon dioxide emissions. Accordingly, sustainable retrofit is an important method to achieve energy reduction and sustainable development. However, the lack of information on retrofit technologies and their benefits trigger stakeholder's opposition to retrofit actions. The Energy Performance Certificate tool can be used to overcome the knowledge gap and boost energy saving by strengthening its recommendation report with retrofit technologies for energy performance. Therefore, this paper attempts to determine the best retrofit technologies to be highlighted in the Energy Performance Certificate's recommendation report by considering stakeholder's opinions. For this purpose, a model based on Quality Function Deployment has been developed. The model analyzes the data regarding stakeholder's expectations when deciding to retrofit, and the potential retrofit technologies used. To validate the applicability of the proposed model, a case study was conducted in Romania. The findings are expected to contribute to improving the quality of the Energy Performance Certificate, as reflecting stakeholder's opinions combined with sustainable concepts to achieve significant energy savings.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 383
页数:17
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Alarcon L. F., 1998, IGLC 1998 C INT GROU
[2]   Involvement of key design participants in refurbishment design process [J].
Ali, Azlan Shah ;
Rahmat, Ismail ;
Hassan, Hasnanywati .
FACILITIES, 2008, 26 (9-10) :389-400
[3]   Awareness, Drivers, Actions, and Barriers of Sustainable Construction in Kuwait [J].
AlSanad, Shaikha .
DEFINING THE FUTURE OF SUSTAINABILITY AND RESILIENCE IN DESIGN, ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2015, 118 :969-983
[4]  
Anagnostopoulos F., 2015, ENERGY PERFORMANCE C, V2015
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2019, BUILDING EQ
[6]  
[Anonymous], CONSTRUCTION MANAGEM
[7]   Money, Comfort or Environment? Priorities and Determinants of Energy Efficiency Investments in Irish Households [J].
Aravena C. ;
Riquelme A. ;
Denny E. .
Journal of Consumer Policy, 2016, 39 (2) :159-186
[8]  
Arcipowska A., 2014, A mapping of national approaches energy performance certificates across the EU BPIE
[9]   Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit strategies: A model and an application [J].
Asadi, Ehsan ;
da Silva, Manuel Gameiro ;
Antunes, Carlos Henggeler ;
Dias, Luis .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 44 :81-87
[10]   Policy measures to overcome barriers to energy renovation of existing buildings [J].
Baek, Cheonghoon ;
Park, Sanghoon .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (06) :3939-3947