The moderating effects of contamination sensitivity on state affect and information processing: Examination of disgust specificity

被引:1
作者
Armstrong, Thomas [1 ]
Tomarken, Andrew J. [1 ]
Olatunji, Bunmi O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol, Nashville, TN 37240 USA
关键词
Disgust; Contamination; OCD; Bias; Emotion; EXPERIENCED DISGUST; DISORDER SYMPTOMS; ATTENTIONAL BIAS; MEDIATION; FEAR;
D O I
10.1080/02699931.2011.561296
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although contamination sensitivity has been implicated in several disorders, there is a paucity of research examining the influence of this trait on various outcomes. Accordingly, the present study examined the extent to which individual differences in contamination sensitivity moderated state affect in response to a mood induction and subsequent information processing biases, as assessed by a lexical decision task (LDT). It was hypothesised that the moderating effects of contamination sensitivity would be specific to disgust responding to a negative but not positive mood induction, and to reaction times to disgust and fear compared to happy words on the LDT. The findings were largely consistent with this hypothesis, as contamination sensitivity predicted increased disgust and arousal to the negative mood induction. Contamination sensitivity was also a better predictor of reaction times to disgust and fear words than happy words. However, the moderating effect of contamination sensitivity on reaction times on the LDT was not mediated by its effects on response to the negative mood induction. Implications of these findings for conceptualising the role of contamination sensitivity and its association with disgust in specific disorders are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 143
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, INT AFFECTIVE PICTUR, DOI DOI 10.1037/T66667-000
  • [2] [Anonymous], J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, DOI DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.967
  • [3] Impact of Experienced Disgust on Information-Processing Biases in Contamination-Based OCD: An Analogue Study
    Armstrong, Thomas
    Divack, Melissa
    David, Bieke
    Simmons, Casey
    Benning, Stephen D.
    Olatunji, Bunmi O.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE THERAPY, 2009, 2 (01): : 37 - 52
  • [4] Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
    Baayen, R. H.
    Davidson, D. J.
    Bates, D. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2008, 59 (04) : 390 - 412
  • [5] Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: A meta-analytic study
    Bar-Haim, Yair
    Lamy, Dominique
    Pergamin, Lee
    Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J.
    van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2007, 133 (01) : 1 - 24
  • [6] Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques
    Bauer, DJ
    Curran, PJ
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2005, 40 (03) : 373 - 400
  • [7] Revision of the Padua Inventory of obsessive compulsive disorder symptoms: Distinctions between worry, obsessions, and compulsions
    Burns, GL
    Keortge, SG
    Formea, GM
    Sternberger, LG
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1996, 34 (02) : 163 - 173
  • [8] Attention bias for disgust
    Charash, M
    McKay, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2002, 16 (05) : 529 - 541
  • [9] Information processing in contamination fear: A covariation bias examination of fear and disgust
    Connolly, Kevin M.
    Lohr, Jeffrey M.
    Olatunji, Bunmi O.
    Hahn, Kathryn S.
    Williams, Nathan L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2009, 23 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [10] Experienced disgust causes a negative interpretation bias: A causal role for disgust in anxious psychopathology
    Davey, Graham C. L.
    Bickerstaffe, Sarah
    MacDonald, Beme A.
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2006, 44 (10) : 1375 - 1384