Information sharing and group conflict: Going beyond decision making to understand the effects of information sharing on group performance

被引:59
作者
Moye, NA
Langfred, CW
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Owen Grad Sch Management, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
[2] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
group conflict; information sharing; performance;
D O I
10.1108/eb022919
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
We investigated the role of task and relationship conflict as mediators of the relationship between information sharing and group performance. We suggest that, in addition to the commonly studied effect of conflict on information sharing, the reverse causal direction is theoretically likely and relevant in today's business climate. Specifically, we hypothesize that information sharing will reduce both task and relationship conflict with beneficial effects on team performance in established groups. We also explore boundary conditions to these conflict-reducing effects of information sharing, suggesting that the lower a group's task interdependence, the more information sharing reduces task conflict, and the lower a group's average general mental ability, the more information sharing reduces relationship conflict. Analysis of data from 38 groups supported our expectations, revealing the expected negative relationships between information sharing and both task and relationship conflict, as well as the expected moderating effects of task interdependence and general mental ability.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 410
页数:30
相关论文
共 65 条
[51]   The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings [J].
Schmidt, FL ;
Hunter, JE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 124 (02) :262-274
[52]   General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance [J].
Schmidt, FL ;
Hunter, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 86 (01) :162-173
[53]   Productive conflict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking [J].
Schulz-Hardt, S ;
Jochims, M ;
Frey, D .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2002, 88 (02) :563-586
[54]  
SCHWEIGER DM, 1989, ACAD MANAGE J, V32, P745, DOI 10.5465/256567
[55]   EFFECTS OF DEVILS ADVOCACY AND DIALECTICAL INQUIRY ON INDIVIDUALS VERSUS GROUPS [J].
SCHWENK, C ;
VALACICH, JS .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1994, 59 (02) :210-222
[57]   Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations [J].
Shrout, PE ;
Bolger, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2002, 7 (04) :422-445
[58]   Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust [J].
Simons, TL ;
Peterson, RS .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 85 (01) :102-111
[59]   "General intelligence " objectively determined and measured [J].
Spearman, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1904, 15 :201-292