Radial and axial water transport in the sugar beet storage root

被引:43
|
作者
Amodeo, G
Dorr, R
Vallejo, A
Sutka, M
Parisi, M
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Med, Dept Fisiol, RA-1121 Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[2] CEA, Ctr Saclay, DBCM, Serv Biol Cellulaire, Saclay, France
关键词
sugar beet; water movements; aquaporins;
D O I
10.1093/jexbot/50.333.509
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
To evaluate the contribution of transcellular, apoplastic and symplastic pathways to water movements, horizontal (axial pathway) and vertical (radial pathway) sugar beet root (Beta vulgaris L.) slices were studied. Volume flows (J(v)) were measured under hydrostatic and/or osmotic gradients, using a computer-based data-acquisition system, When tissues were tested under hydrostatic gradients (0.3 MPa m(-1)) a much more important permeability was observed in the axial pathway, as compared with the radial one. Negative pressure gradients (tensions) were as effective as positive ones in inducing a net water movement. After the establishment of a concentration gradient in the radial pathway (obtained by adding 300 M m(-3) mannitol to the employed solution) an osmotic flux, sensitive to HgCl2, was observed. The inhibitory effect of mercurial compounds was reversed by beta-mercaptoethanol while [C-14] mannitol unidirectional fluxes were not affected by mercurial agents. In the axial pathway, the presence of a mannitol gradient did not develop a sustained osmotic flux. After an initial J(v) in the expected direction, the J(v) reversed and moved in the opposite way. It is concluded that, in the sugar beet root, water channels play a significant role in water transfers in the radial pathway. On the other side, water and solutes are transported by a hydrostatic gradient in the xylem vessels. In general, these results extend and adapt to a storage root the 'composite transport model' first proposed by Steudle et al.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 516
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ROOT EXUDATES OF SUGAR BEET: COMPOSITION AND THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THEIR STUDY AND AZETIDIN-2-CARBOXYLIC ACID IN SUGAR BEET
    Vranova, Valerie
    Rejsek, Klement
    Formanek, Pavel
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2012, 128 (01): : 22 - 25
  • [22] INFLUENCE OF VARIETY AND BIOPREPARATIONS ON ROOT YIELD, SUGAR CONTENT AND POLARIZED SUGAR YIELD OF SUGAR BEET
    Pacuta, Vladimr
    Kasickova, Ivana
    Rasovsky, Marek
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2015, 131 (5-6): : 168 - 171
  • [23] The potential nutritional value of root dry mass from sugar beet, fodder beet and table beet
    Enchev, Stanimir
    Bozhanska, Tatyana
    BULGARIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2024, 30 (02): : 356 - 362
  • [24] ROOT YIELD, SUGAR CONTENT AND WHITE SUGAR YIELD IN DEPENDENCE ON YEAR AND SUGAR BEET VARIETY
    Cerny, Ivan
    Pacuta, Vladimir
    Ernst, David
    Zapletalova, Alexandra
    Rasovsky, Marek
    Sulik, Richard
    Buso, Rastislav
    Gazo, Jan
    Pincek, Ondrej
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2021, 137 (5-6): : 204 - 208
  • [25] Root Causes of Flowering: Two Sides of Bolting in Sugar Beet
    Kroupin, Pavel Yu.
    Kroupina, Aleksandra Yu.
    Karlov, Gennady I.
    Divashuk, Mikhail G.
    Chu, Chenggen
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [26] Sugar beet root rot loss: ANN and Regression models
    Eslami, A. S.
    Safaie, N.
    Mahmoudi, S. B.
    Mojerlou, Sh.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2021, 131
  • [27] Root renewal of sugar beet as a mechanism of P uptake efficiency
    Steingrobe, B
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2001, 164 (05) : 533 - 539
  • [28] INFLUENCE OF NITROGEN FERTILIZATION ON SUGAR BEET ROOT YIELD AND QUALITY
    Kristek, Suzana
    Kristek, Andrija
    Evacic, Martin
    CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2008, 36 : 371 - 374
  • [29] Effect of soil cultivation and fertilization on sugar beet root quality
    Muchova, Z
    Francakova, H
    Slamka, P
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1998, 44 (04): : 167 - 172
  • [30] RESPONSE OF SUGAR BEET TO SOIL WATER DEFICIT
    Pejic, Borivoj
    Cupina, Branko
    Dimitrijevic, Miodrag
    Petrovic, Sofija
    Milic, Stanko
    Krstic, Djordje
    Jacimovic, Goran
    ROMANIAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2011, 28 : 151 - 155