MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T:: Comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging

被引:99
作者
Beyersdorff, D
Taymoorian, K
Knösel, T
Schnorr, D
Felix, R
Hamm, B
Bruhn, H
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Dept Radiol, Charite, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Med Berlin, Dept Urol, Charite, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Med Berlin, Inst Pathol, Charite, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Med Berlin, Dept Radiat Med, Charite, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.2214/AJR.04.1584
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. This prospective study was performed to compare the image quality, tumor delineation, and depiction of staging criteria on MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-four patients with prostate cancer underwent MRI at 1.5 T using the combined endorectal-body phased-array coil and at 3.0 T using the torso phased-array coil, among them 22 before undergoing radical prostatectomy. The prostate was imaged with T2-weighted sequences in axial and coronal orientations at both field strengths and, in addition, with an axial T1-weighted sequence at 1.5 T. Preoperative analysis of all MR images taken together was compared with the histologic findings to determine the accuracy of MRI for the local staging of prostate cancer. In a retroanalysis, the image quality, tumor delineation, and conspicuity of staging criteria were determined separately for both field strengths and compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon's and the McNemar tests. RESULTS. In the preoperative analysis, MRI (at both 1.5 and 3.0 T) had an accuracy of 73% for the local staging of prostate cancer. The retroanalysis yielded significantly better results for 1.5-T MRI with the endorectal-body phased-array coil in terms of image quality (p < 0.001) and tumor delineation (p = 0.012) than for 3.0-T MRI with the torso phased-array coil. Analysis of the individual staging criteria for extracapsular disease did not reveal a superiority of either of the two field strengths in the depiction of any of the criteria. CONCLUSION. Intraindividual comparison shows that image quality and delineation of prostate cancer at 1.5 T with the use of an endorectal coil in a pelvic phased-array is superior to the higher field strength of 3.0 T with a torso phased-array coil alone. As long as no endorectal coil is available for 3-T imaging, imaging at 1.5 T using the combined endorectal-body phased-array coil will continue to be the gold standard for prostate imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:1214 / 1220
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] PROSTATIC DISORDERS - MR IMAGING AT 1.5 T
    PHILLIPS, ME
    KRESSEL, HY
    SPRITZER, CE
    ARGER, PH
    WEIN, AJ
    MARINELLI, D
    AXEL, L
    GEFTER, WB
    POLLACK, HM
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (02) : 386 - 392
  • [22] Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: Comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging
    Presti, JC
    Hricak, H
    Narayan, PA
    Shinohara, K
    White, S
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1996, 166 (01) : 103 - 108
  • [23] MR-IMAGING OF PROSTATE-CANCER WITH AN ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL TECHNIQUE - CORRELATION WITH WHOLE-MOUNT SPECIMENS
    QUINN, SF
    FRANZINI, DA
    DEMLOW, TA
    ROSENCRANTZ, DR
    KIM, JH
    HANNA, RM
    SZUMOWSKI, J
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1994, 190 (02) : 323 - 327
  • [24] PROSTATE - MR IMAGING WITH AN ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL
    SCHNALL, MD
    LENKINSKI, RE
    POLLACK, HM
    IMAI, Y
    KRESSEL, HY
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1989, 172 (02) : 570 - 574
  • [25] PROSTATE-CANCER - LOCAL STAGING WITH ENDORECTAL SURFACE COIL MR IMAGING
    SCHNALL, MD
    IMAI, Y
    TOMASZEWSKI, J
    POLLACK, HM
    LENKINSKI, RE
    KRESSEL, HY
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 178 (03) : 797 - 802
  • [26] Suspected local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Endorectal coil MR imaging
    Sella, T
    Schwartz, LH
    Swindle, PW
    Onyebuchi, CN
    Scardino, PT
    Scher, HI
    Hricak, H
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) : 379 - 385
  • [27] Determinations of prostate volume at 3-tesla using an external phased array coil: Comparison to pathologic specimens
    Sosna, J
    Rofsky, NM
    Gaston, SM
    DeWolf, WC
    Lenkinski, RE
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2003, 10 (08) : 846 - 853
  • [28] INVASION OF THE NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE BY PROSTATE-CANCER - EVALUATION WITH MR IMAGING
    TEMPANY, CMC
    RAHMOUNI, AD
    EPSTEIN, JI
    WALSH, PC
    ZERHOUNI, EA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 181 (01) : 107 - 112
  • [29] PROSTATE-CANCER - EFFECT OF POSTBIOPSY HEMORRHAGE ON INTERPRETATION OF MR-IMAGES
    WHITE, S
    HRICAK, H
    FORSTNER, R
    KURHANEWICZ, J
    VIGNERON, DB
    ZALOUDEK, CJ
    WEISS, JM
    NARAYAN, P
    CARROLL, PR
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1995, 195 (02) : 385 - 390
  • [30] Detection of extracapsular extension of prostate carcinoma with endorectal and phased-array coil MR imaging: Multivariate feature analysis
    Yu, KK
    Hricak, H
    Alagappan, R
    Chernoff, DM
    Bacchetti, P
    Zaloudek, CJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (03) : 697 - 702