MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T:: Comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging

被引:99
作者
Beyersdorff, D
Taymoorian, K
Knösel, T
Schnorr, D
Felix, R
Hamm, B
Bruhn, H
机构
[1] Univ Med Berlin, Dept Radiol, Charite, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Med Berlin, Dept Urol, Charite, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Med Berlin, Inst Pathol, Charite, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[4] Univ Med Berlin, Dept Radiat Med, Charite, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.2214/AJR.04.1584
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. This prospective study was performed to compare the image quality, tumor delineation, and depiction of staging criteria on MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-four patients with prostate cancer underwent MRI at 1.5 T using the combined endorectal-body phased-array coil and at 3.0 T using the torso phased-array coil, among them 22 before undergoing radical prostatectomy. The prostate was imaged with T2-weighted sequences in axial and coronal orientations at both field strengths and, in addition, with an axial T1-weighted sequence at 1.5 T. Preoperative analysis of all MR images taken together was compared with the histologic findings to determine the accuracy of MRI for the local staging of prostate cancer. In a retroanalysis, the image quality, tumor delineation, and conspicuity of staging criteria were determined separately for both field strengths and compared. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon's and the McNemar tests. RESULTS. In the preoperative analysis, MRI (at both 1.5 and 3.0 T) had an accuracy of 73% for the local staging of prostate cancer. The retroanalysis yielded significantly better results for 1.5-T MRI with the endorectal-body phased-array coil in terms of image quality (p < 0.001) and tumor delineation (p = 0.012) than for 3.0-T MRI with the torso phased-array coil. Analysis of the individual staging criteria for extracapsular disease did not reveal a superiority of either of the two field strengths in the depiction of any of the criteria. CONCLUSION. Intraindividual comparison shows that image quality and delineation of prostate cancer at 1.5 T with the use of an endorectal coil in a pelvic phased-array is superior to the higher field strength of 3.0 T with a torso phased-array coil alone. As long as no endorectal coil is available for 3-T imaging, imaging at 1.5 T using the combined endorectal-body phased-array coil will continue to be the gold standard for prostate imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:1214 / 1220
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Beyersdorff D, 2003, ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG, V175, P799
  • [2] Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: Value of MR imaging
    Beyersdorff, D
    Taupitz, M
    Winkelmann, B
    Fischer, T
    Lenk, S
    Loening, SA
    Hamm, B
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) : 701 - 706
  • [3] 3 Tesla magnetic resonance Imaging of the prostate with combined pelvic phased-array and endorectal coils: Initial experience
    Bloch, BN
    Rofsky, NM
    Baroni, RH
    Marquis, RP
    Pedrosa, I
    Lenkinski, RE
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2004, 11 (08) : 863 - 867
  • [4] CONTRAST-ENHANCED ENDORECTAL COIL MRI IN LOCAL STAGING OF PROSTATE CARCINOMA
    BONI, RAH
    BONER, JA
    LUTOLF, UM
    TRINKLER, F
    PESTALOZZI, DM
    KRESTIN, GP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1995, 19 (02) : 232 - 237
  • [5] Preoperative T-staging of prostate carcinoma: Endorectal MRI compared with other imaging and clinical methods.
    Boni, RAH
    Hutter, BE
    Trinkler, F
    Jochum, W
    Pestalozzi, D
    Krestin, GP
    [J]. ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1996, 165 (02): : 152 - 158
  • [6] NMR SCANNING OF THE PELVIS - INITIAL EXPERIENCE WITH A 0.3 T SYSTEM
    BRYAN, PJ
    BUTLER, HE
    LIPUMA, JP
    HAAGA, JR
    ELYOUSEF, SJ
    RESNICK, MI
    COHEN, AM
    MALVIYA, VK
    NELSON, AD
    CLAMPITT, M
    ALFIDI, RJ
    COHEN, J
    MORRISON, SC
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1983, 141 (06) : 1111 - 1118
  • [7] Brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Endorectal MR imaging of local treatment-related changes
    Coakley, FV
    Hricak, H
    Wefer, AE
    Speight, JL
    Kurhanewicz, J
    Roach, M
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 219 (03) : 817 - 821
  • [8] Colombo T, 1999, Minerva Urol Nefrol, V51, P1
  • [9] Dennis LK, 2000, PROSTATE, V42, P247
  • [10] Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer
    Harisinghani, MG
    Barentsz, J
    Hahn, PF
    Deserno, WM
    Tabatabaei, S
    van de Kaa, CH
    de la Rosette, J
    Weissleder, R
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (25) : 2491 - U5