Quantification of Inbreeding Due to Distant Ancestors and Its Detection Using Dense Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Data

被引:363
作者
Keller, Matthew C. [1 ,2 ]
Visscher, Peter M. [3 ]
Goddard, Michael E. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Psychol & Neurosci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Inst Behav Genet, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Queensland Inst Med Res, Queensland Stat Genet Lab, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia
[4] Univ Melbourne, Fac Land & Food Resources, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[5] Dept Primary Ind, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
HOMOZYGOSITY IDENTIFY; COMPLEX DISEASES; EXTENDED TRACTS; POPULATION-SIZE; GENOME; CONSANGUINITY; INDIVIDUALS; RUNS; DEPRESSION; RISK;
D O I
10.1534/genetics.111.130922
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Inbreeding depression, which refers to reduced fitness among offspring of related parents, has traditionally been studied using pedigrees. In practice, pedigree information is difficult to obtain, potentially unreliable, and rarely assessed for inbreeding arising from common ancestors who lived more than a few generations ago. Recently, there has been excitement about using SNP data to estimate inbreeding (F) arising from distant common ancestors in apparently "outbred" populations. Statistical power to detect inbreeding depression using SNP data depends on the actual variation in inbreeding in a population, the accuracy of detecting that with marker data, the effect size, and the sample size. No one has yet investigated what variation in F is expected in SNP data as a function of population size, and it is unclear which estimate of F is optimal for detecting inbreeding depression. In the present study, we use theory, simulated genetic data, and real genetic data to find the optimal estimate of F, to quantify the likely variation in F in populations of various sizes, and to estimate the power to detect inbreeding depression. We find that F estimated from runs of homozygosity (F-roh), which reflects shared ancestry of genetic haplotypes, retains variation in even large populations (e.g., SD = 0.5% when N-e = 10,000) and is likely to be the most powerful method of detecting inbreeding effects from among several alternative estimates of F. However, large samples (e.g., 12,000-65,000) will be required to detect inbreeding depression for likely effect sizes, and so studies using Froh to date have probably been underpowered.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / U920
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
[21]   A FULLER THEORY OF JUNCTIONS IN INBREEDING [J].
FISHER, RA .
HEREDITY, 1954, 8 (02) :187-197
[22]   DISTRIBUTION OF PROPORTION OF GENOME WHICH IS HOMOZYGOUS BY DESCENT IN INBRED INDIVIDUALS [J].
FRANKLIN, IR .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1977, 11 (01) :60-80
[23]   Extended tracts of homozygosity in outbred human populations [J].
Gibson, J ;
Morton, NE ;
Collins, A .
HUMAN MOLECULAR GENETICS, 2006, 15 (05) :789-795
[24]  
GINDILIS VM, 1989, GENETIKA+, V25, P734
[25]   Variation in actual relationship as a consequence of Mendelian sampling and linkage [J].
Hill, W. G. ;
Weir, B. S. .
GENETICS RESEARCH, 2011, 93 (01) :47-64
[26]   Genome-wide homozygosity signatures and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia risk [J].
Hosking, Fay J. ;
Papaemmanuil, Elli ;
Sheridan, Eammon ;
Kinsey, Sally E. ;
Lightfoot, Tracy ;
Roman, Eve ;
Irving, Julie A. E. ;
Allan, James M. ;
Taylor, Malcolm ;
Tomlinson, Ian P. ;
Greaves, Mel ;
Houlston, Richard S. .
BLOOD, 2010, 115 (22) :4472-4477
[27]  
*INT SCHIZ CONS, 2009, MOL PSYCH, V14, P10
[28]   Comparative recombination rates in the rat, mouse, and human genomes [J].
Jensen-Seaman, MI ;
Furey, TS ;
Payseur, BA ;
Lu, YT ;
Roskin, KM ;
Chen, CF ;
Thomas, MA ;
Haussler, D ;
Jacob, HJ .
GENOME RESEARCH, 2004, 14 (04) :528-538
[29]   Where the crossovers are: Recombination distributions in mammals [J].
Kauppi, L ;
Jeffreys, AJ ;
Keeney, S .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2004, 5 (06) :413-424
[30]   Regions of homozygosity and their impact on complex diseases and traits [J].
Ku, Chee Seng ;
Naidoo, Nasheen ;
Teo, Shu Mei ;
Pawitan, Yudi .
HUMAN GENETICS, 2011, 129 (01) :1-15