HIGH RISK OF ABRUPT CLIMATE CHANGE REQUIRING CLOSELY ESTIMATE BIOFUEL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS BY LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT

被引:0
作者
Vilums, Sandis [1 ]
机构
[1] Latvia Univ Agr, Jelgava, Latvia
来源
14TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE: ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT | 2015年
关键词
abrupt climate change; life cycle assessment; biofuels; SEA-ICE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The article focuses on a specific environmental evaluation method - Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and it estimates biofuel greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and compares to fossil fuels. It is mainly evaluated by the mean Global Warming impact indicator, expressed in grams of CO2 equivalent per MJ of energy (gCO(2)eq.MJ(-1)). Biofuels are highly relevant renewable energy options on a global scale. Comparing with fossil fuels, biofuels in some cases can be carbon neutral or even carbon negative and play an important role in the reduction of GHG emissions. A number of LCA have shown that first generation biofuels provide a little to no benefit for GHG reductions compared to fossil fuels, particularly when indirect effects are considered. LCAs of second and third generation biofuels exhibit great variability and uncertainty but are intended to achieve greater GHG reductions. Highly possible Arctic Ocean ice meltdown in the late summer as soon as in September 2015 and accelerated methane hydrate destabilization in the Arctic Ocean seabed via ocean warming could cause abrupt climate change in the following decade. Mitigation of climate change requires to use only biofuels with the global warming impact indicator close to 0 gCO(2)eq.MJ(-1) (Carbon Neutral) or - gCO(2)eq.MJ(-1) (Carbon Negative).
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 300
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, V52, P16, DOI [10.3000/17252555.L_2009.140.eng, DOI 10.3000/17252555.L_2009.140.ENG]
[2]  
[Anonymous], RESOURCES CONSERVATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Renewable Fuel Standard Program (RFS2) Regulatory Impact Analysis, P1109
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COMP EN SYST US LIF
[5]   Origins of the debate on the life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy consumption of first-generation biofuels - A sensitivity analysis approach [J].
Benoist, Anthony ;
Dron, Dominique ;
Zoughaib, Assaad .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 40 :133-142
[6]   Climate change prediction: Erring on the side of least drama? [J].
Brysse, Keynyn ;
Oreskes, Naomi ;
O'Reilly, Jessica ;
Oppenheimer, Michael .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (01) :327-337
[7]  
Dragone G., 2010, TECHNOLOGY ED TOPICS, P1355, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.ENCONMAN.2009.03.001, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.03.012, DOI 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2011.03.012]
[8]   Natural and anthropogenic changes in atmospheric CO2 over the last 1000 years from air in Antarctic ice and firn [J].
Etheridge, DM ;
Steele, LP ;
Langenfelds, RL ;
Francey, RJ ;
Barnola, JM ;
Morgan, VI .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D2) :4115-4128
[9]  
Hansen J, 2013, PLOS ONE, V8, DOI [10.1371/journal.pone.0081648, 10.1371/journal.pone.0080954]
[10]   Evaluation of Arctic sea ice thickness simulated by Arctic Ocean Model Intercomparison Project models [J].
Johnson, Mark ;
Proshutinsky, Andrey ;
Aksenov, Yevgeny ;
Nguyen, An T. ;
Lindsay, Ron ;
Haas, Christian ;
Zhang, Jinlun ;
Diansky, Nikolay ;
Kwok, Ron ;
Maslowski, Wieslaw ;
Haekkinen, Sirpa ;
Ashik, Igor ;
de Cuevas, Beverly .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2012, 117