Assistance Dogs: Historic Patterns and Roles of Dogs Placed by ADI or IGDF Accredited Facilities and by Non-Accredited US Facilities

被引:56
作者
Walther, Sandra [1 ]
Yamamoto, Mariko [2 ]
Thigpen, Abigail Paige [1 ]
Garcia, Anaissa [1 ]
Willits, Neil H. [3 ]
Hart, Lynette A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Sch Vet Med, Dept Populat Hlth & Reprod, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Teikyo Univ Sci, Yamanashi, Japan
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Stat, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Assistance Dogs International; autism dogs; diabetes dogs; hearing dogs; International Guide Dog Federation; mobility dogs; seizure dogs; service dogs; SERVICE DOGS; CANINE RESPONSES; GUIDE-DOGS; JAPAN; ATTITUDES; STUDENTS; WELFARE; PEOPLE; USERS;
D O I
10.3389/fvets.2017.00001
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Dogs' roles to support people with disabilities are increasing. Existing U.S. laws and regulations pertaining to the use of dogs for people with disabilities are only minimally enforced. Pushback legislation against some aspects of uses of assistance dogs currently is being passed or proposed in several states. Further, the U.S. Department of the Army and the Veterans' Administration support only dogs trained by an Assistance Dogs International (ADI) or International Guide Dog Federation (IGDF) accredited facility. Lacking a mandatory national process for screening the selection, training, and placement of assistance dogs with persons who have disabilities, the U.S. offers a creative but confusing opportunity for people to train their own dogs for any disability. While no U.S. surveillance system monitors assistance dogs, other countries generally have a legislated or regulatory process for approving assistance dogs or a cultural convention for obtaining dogs from accredited facilities. We conducted an online survey investigating current demographics of assistance dogs placed in 2013 and 2014 with persons who have disabilities, by facilities worldwide that are associated with ADI or IGDF and by some non-accredited U.S. facilities. Placement data from ADI and IGDF facilities revealed that in most countries aside from the U.S., guide dogs were by far the main type of assistance dog placed. In the U.S., there were about equal numbers of mobility and guide dogs placed, including many placed by large older facilities, along with smaller numbers of other types of assistance dogs. In non-accredited U.S. facilities, psychiatric dogs accounted for most placements. Dogs for families with an autistic child were increasing in all regions around the world. Of dog breeds placed, accredited facilities usually mentioned Labrador Retrievers and Golden Retrievers, and sometimes, German Shepherd Dogs. The facilities bred their dogs in-house, or acquired them from certain breeders. Non-accredited facilities more often used dogs from shelters or assisted people in training their own dogs. Facilities in Europe and the U.S. place dogs in all roles; other parts of the world primarily focus on guide dogs. Expansion of assistance dogs in many roles is continuing, with numbers of dogs placed accelerating internationally.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Relationships between puppy management practices and reported measures of success in guide dog training
    Batt, Lara
    Batt, Marjolyn
    Baguley, John
    McGreevy, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY BEHAVIOR-CLINICAL APPLICATIONS AND RESEARCH, 2010, 5 (05) : 240 - 246
  • [2] Sentinels of Safety: Service Dogs Ensure Safety and Enhance Freedom and Well-Being for Families With Autistic Children
    Burrows, Kristen E.
    Adams, Cindy L.
    Spiers, Jude
    [J]. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH, 2008, 18 (12) : 1642 - 1649
  • [3] Factors affecting behavior and welfare of service dogs for children with autism spectrum disorder
    Burrows, Kristen E.
    Adams, Cindy L.
    Millman, Suzanne T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2008, 11 (01) : 42 - 62
  • [4] THE EFFICIENCY AND WALKING SPEED OF VISUALLY-IMPAIRED PEOPLE
    CLARKCARTER, DD
    HEYES, AD
    HOWARTH, CI
    [J]. ERGONOMICS, 1986, 29 (06) : 779 - 789
  • [5] ON SOCIAL ASPECTS OF THE USAGE OF GUIDE-DOGS AND LONG-CANES
    DESHEN, S
    DESHEN, H
    [J]. SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 37 (01) : 89 - 103
  • [6] Hart L. A., 1987, Anthrozoos, V1, P41, DOI 10.2752/089279388787058696
  • [7] Hart LA., 2015, HDB ANIMAL ASSISTED, V4th, P53, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-12-801292-5.00006-7, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801292-5.00006-7, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-801292-5.00006-7]
  • [8] Hart LA, 2017, DOMESTIC DOG: ITS EVOLUTION, BEHAVIOR AND INTERACTIONS WITH PEOPLE, 2ND EDITION, P247
  • [9] Assessment of Dog Guides by Users in Japan and Suggestions for Improvement
    Koda, Naoko
    Kubo, Masumi
    Ishigami, Tomomi
    Furuhashi, Hiroaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VISUAL IMPAIRMENT & BLINDNESS, 2011, 105 (10) : 591 - 600
  • [10] Dogs for the disabled: benefits to recipients and welfare of the dog
    Lane, DR
    McNicholas, J
    Collis, GM
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1998, 59 (1-3) : 49 - 60