Interventions for sustainable surgery: a systematic review

被引:10
|
作者
Lam, Kyle [1 ]
Gadi, Nishita [1 ]
Acharya, Amish [1 ]
Winter Beatty, Jasmine [1 ]
Darzi, Ara [1 ]
Purkayastha, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Hosp, Dept Surg & Canc, London, England
关键词
carbon footprint; planetary health; surgery; sustainability; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CARBON FOOTPRINT; HEALTH; IMPACT; COSTS;
D O I
10.1097/JS9.0000000000000359
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To systematically evaluate interventions designed to improve the sustainability of surgical practice with respect to their environmental and financial impact. Background: Surgery contributes significantly to emissions attributed to healthcare due to its high resource and energy use. Several interventions across the operative pathway have, therefore, been trialed to minimize this impact. Few comparisons of the environmental and financial effects of these interventions exist. Materials and methods: A search of studies published up to 2nd February 2022 describing interventions to increase surgical sustainability was undertaken. Articles regarding the environmental impact of only anesthetic agents were excluded. Data regarding environmental and financial outcomes were extracted with a quality assessment completed dependent upon the study design. Results: In all, 1162 articles were retrieved, of which 21 studies met inclusion criteria. Twenty-five interventions were described, which were categorized into five domains: 'reduce and rationalize', 'reusable equipment and textiles', 'recycling and waste segregation', 'anesthetic alternatives', and 'other'. Eleven of the 21 studies examined reusable devices; those demonstrating a benefit reported 40-66% lower emissions than with single-use alternatives. In studies not showing a lower carbon footprint, the reduction in manufacturing emissions was offset by the high environmental impact of local fossil fuel-based energy required for sterilization. The per use monetary cost of reusable equipment was 47-83% of the single-use equivalent. Conclusions: A narrow repertoire of interventions to improve the environmental sustainability of surgery has been trialed. The majority focuses on reusable equipment. Emissions and cost data are limited, with longitudinal impacts rarely investigated. Real-world appraisals will facilitate implementation, as will an understanding of how sustainability impacts surgical decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:1447 / 1458
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interventions to achieve environmentally sustainable operating theatres: an umbrella systematic review using the behaviour change wheel
    Almukhtar, Aws
    Batcup, Carys
    Bowman, Miranda
    Beatty, Jasmine Winter
    Leff, Daniel
    Demirel, Pelin
    Judah, Gaby
    Porat, Talya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 110 (11) : 7245 - 7267
  • [2] A systematic review of sustainability practices in plastic surgery
    Iakovou, Despoina
    Sousi, Sara
    Glynou, Sevasti Panagiota
    Ahmed, Zahra
    Zargaran, Alexander
    Zargaran, David
    Mosahebi, Afshin
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2025, 102 : 104 - 113
  • [3] The environmental impact of surgery: A systematic review
    Shoham, Maia A.
    Baker, Natalie M.
    Peterson, Meagan E.
    Fox, Paige
    SURGERY, 2022, 172 (03) : 897 - 905
  • [4] Clinician and health service interventions to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions generated by healthcare: a systematic review
    Pickles, Kristen
    Haas, Romi
    Guppy, Michelle
    O'Connor, Denise A.
    Pathirana, Thanya
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (05) : 300 - 312
  • [5] Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Sustainable Employability: A Systematic Review
    Hazelzet, Emmelie
    Picco, Eleonora
    Houkes, Inge
    Bosma, Hans
    de Rijk, Angelique
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 16 (11)
  • [6] Interventions to support caregivers of older adults undergoing surgery: A systematic review
    Navab, Elham
    Legacy, Nicholas
    Haase, Kristen R.
    Freeman, Laura
    Smith, Ainslee
    Goudarzian, Amir Hossein
    Ayala, Ana Patricia
    Donison, Valentina
    Sirois, Ailsa
    Sharifi, Farshad
    Chesney, Tyler R.
    Wong, Camilla
    Callow, Joanne
    Boswell, Dominque
    Alibhai, Shabbir
    Puts, Martine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 242
  • [7] Environmental sustainability in robotic and laparoscopic surgery: systematic review
    Papadopoulou, Ariadni
    Kumar, Niraj S.
    Vanhoestenberghe, Anne
    Francis, Nader K.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109 (10) : 921 - 932
  • [8] Environmental sustainability in obstetrics and gynaecology: A systematic review
    Cohen, Eva Sayone
    Kouwenberg, Lisanne H. J. A.
    Moody, Kate S.
    Weiland, Nicolaas H. Sperna H.
    Kringos, Dionne Sofia
    Timmermans, Anne
    Hehenkamp, Wouter J. K.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2024, 131 (05) : 555 - 567
  • [9] A systematic literature review of quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management
    Flores-Siguenza, Pablo
    Antonio Marmolejo-Saucedo, Jose
    Niembro-Garcia, Joaquina
    Manuel Lopez-Sanchez, Victor
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2021, 18 (03) : 2206 - 2229
  • [10] Innovations towards achieving environmentally sustainable operating theatres: A systematic review
    Perry, Helen
    Reeves, Nicola
    Ansell, James
    Cornish, Julie
    Torkington, Jared
    Morris, Daniel S.
    Brennan, Fiona
    Horwood, James
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2023, 21 (03): : 141 - 151