Factors Associated With Outcome of Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy

被引:26
作者
Hammoudi, Dena S. [1 ]
Tucker, Nancy A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Mt Sinai Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada
关键词
ENDOSCOPIC DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY; EXTERNAL DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY; OSTIUM; SIZE;
D O I
10.1097/IOP.0b013e31820c72b7
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To identify factors associated with outcome of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Methods: One hundred thirty-four cases of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in 111 patients performed for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction by a single surgeon between March 12, 2002 and November 10, 2008 were included in a retrospective, noncomparative case series. Variables assessed during the surgery included intranasal view, difficulty of bone removal, size of the lacrimal sac, presence of lacrimal sac stones, orbital fat prolapse and degree of bleeding. Successful outcome was defined as patency to lacrimal irrigation at final follow up. Results: One hundred twenty-one of the 134 cases (90%) were patent to irrigation at final follow up (mean 8.8 +/- 8.6 months). A small lacrimal sac opening intraoperatively was associated with higher risk of failure (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 5.7 [1.6, 20] [p = 0.0072]). Orbital fat prolapse had a trend toward higher risk of failure that approached statistical significance (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] of 5.3 [0.87, 32] [p = 0.0698]). A narrow intranasal view, difficult bony opening, lacrimal sac stones, and bleeding were not associated with outcome. Conclusions: A small lacrimal sac opening intraoperatively was associated with failure of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 269
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   External versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in a tertiary referral center [J].
Ben Simon, GJ ;
Joseph, J ;
Lee, S ;
Schwarcz, RM ;
McCann, JD ;
Goldberg, RA .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 112 (08) :1463-1468
[2]  
BUMSTED RM, 1982, ARCH OTOLARYNGOL, V108, P407
[3]  
Caldwell G W., 1893, American Journal of Ophthalmology. Am J Ophtalmol, V10, P189
[4]   Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy [J].
Dolman, PJ .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2003, 110 (01) :78-84
[5]   Nonlaser Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy with Adjunctive Mitomycin C in Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Adults [J].
Dolmetsch, Angela M. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 117 (05) :1037-1040
[6]   The role of accompanying sinonasal abnormalities in the outcome of endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy [J].
Eyigor, Hulya ;
Unsal, A. Ipek ;
Unsal, Alparslan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY, 2006, 20 (06) :620-624
[7]   Ultrasonic assessment of rhinostomy size following external dacryocystorhinostomy [J].
Ezra, E ;
Restori, M ;
Mannor, GE ;
Rose, GE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 82 (07) :786-789
[8]   Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy [J].
Hartikainen, J ;
Grenman, R ;
Puukka, P ;
Seppä, H .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (06) :1106-1113
[9]   Prospective randomized comparison of endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy [J].
Hartikainen, J ;
Antila, J ;
Varpula, M ;
Puukka, P ;
Seppä, H ;
Grénman, R .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 1998, 108 (12) :1861-1866
[10]   Assisted local anaesthesia for endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy [J].
Howden, Juliette ;
McCluskey, Peter ;
O'Sullivan, Greg ;
Ghabrial, Raf .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 35 (03) :256-261