Glaucoma Diagnosis Through the Integration of Optical Coherence Tomography/Angiography and Machine Learning Diagnostic Models

被引:8
|
作者
Kooner, Karanjit S. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Angirekula, Ashika [1 ]
Treacher, Alex H. [3 ]
Al-Humimat, Ghadeer [1 ,4 ]
Marzban, Mohamed F. [5 ]
Chen, Alyssa [1 ]
Pradhan, Roma [1 ]
Tunga, Nita [1 ]
Wang, Chuhan [1 ]
Ahuja, Pranati [1 ]
Zuberi, Hafsa [1 ]
Montillo, Albert A. [3 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Dallas, TX USA
[2] Vet Affairs North Texas Hlth Care Syst Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Lyda Hill Dept Bioinformat, Dallas, TX USA
[4] King Hussein Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Amman, Jordan
[5] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Elect Engn, Dallas, TX USA
[6] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Dallas, TX USA
[7] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Adv Imaging Res Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[8] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
来源
CLINICAL OPHTHALMOLOGY | 2022年 / 16卷
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
glaucoma; optical coherence tomography angiography; deep learning; TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; DENSITY; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.2147/OPTH.S367722
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To establish optical coherence tomography (OCT)/angiography (OCTA) parameter ranges for healthy eyes (HE) and glaucomatous eyes (GE) for a North Texas based population; to develop a machine learning (ML) tool and to identify the most accurate diagnostic parameters for clinical glaucoma diagnosis. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, we included 1371 eligible eyes, 462 HE and 909 GE (377 ocular hypertension, 160 mild, 156 moderate, 216 severe), from 735 subjects. Demographic data and full OCTA parameters were collected. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to produce the normative database. Models were trained to solve a two-class problem (HE vs GE) and four-class problem (HE vs mild vs moderate vs severe GE). A rigorous nested, stratified, group, 5x10 fold cross-validation strategy was applied to partition the data. Six ML algorithms were compared using classical and deep learning approaches. Over 2500 ML models were optimized using random search, with performance compared using mean validation accuracy. Final performance was reported on held-out test data using accuracy and F1 score. Decision trees and feature importance were produced for the final model. Results: We found differences across glaucoma severities for age, gender, hypertension, Black and Asian race, and all OCTA parameters, except foveal avascular zone area and perimeter (p<0.05). The XGBoost algorithm achieved the highest test performance for both the two-class (F1 score 83.8%; accuracy 83.9%; standard deviation 0.03%) and four-class (F1 score 62.4%; accuracy 71.3%; standard deviation 0.013%) problem. A set of interpretable decision trees provided the most important predictors of the final model; inferior temporal and inferior hemisphere vessel density and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness were identified as key diagnostic parameters. Conclusion: This study established a normative database for our North Texas based population and created ML tools utilizing OCT/A that may aid clinicians in glaucoma management.
引用
收藏
页码:2685 / 2697
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Diagnostic Value of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Glaucoma
    Koutropoulou, Nikolitsa
    Panos, Georgios D.
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 17 (10) : 1179 - 1182
  • [2] Optical coherence tomography angiography for glaucoma diagnosis and observation
    Balyen, Lokman
    Kaya, Mahmut
    Arikan, Gul
    Gunenc, Uzeyir
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 11 (04): : 354 - 358
  • [3] Machine Learning for Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
    Lo, Julian
    Heisler, Morgan
    Athwal, Arman
    Tran, Francis
    Sarunic, Marinko, V
    OPTICAL COHERENCE IMAGING TECHNIQUES AND IMAGING IN SCATTERING MEDIA III, 2019, 11078
  • [4] Machine learning in optical coherence tomography angiography
    Le, David
    Son, Taeyoon
    Yao, Xincheng
    EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 246 (20) : 2170 - 2183
  • [5] Optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma
    Bojikian, Karine D.
    Chen, Philip P.
    Wen, Joanne C.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 30 (02) : 110 - 116
  • [6] Optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma: diagnosis, progression, and correlation with functional tests
    Triolo, Giacinto
    Rabiolo, Alessandro
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 12
  • [7] Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Glaucoma
    Rao, Harsha L.
    Pradhan, Zia S.
    Suh, Min Hee
    Moghimi, Sasan
    Mansouri, Kaweh
    Weinreb, Robert N.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2020, 29 (04) : 312 - 321
  • [8] Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Glaucoma
    Hollo, Gabor
    TURK OFTALMOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 48 (04): : 196 - 201
  • [9] Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Glaucoma
    Ma, Jeffrey
    Nesper, Peter L.
    Anchala, Anupama
    Fawzi, Amani A.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [10] Optical coherence tomography angiography in glaucoma
    Hong, Jimmy
    Tan, Shayne S.
    Chua, Jacqueline
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2024, 107 (02) : 110 - 121