The Medicare Advantage Quality Bonus Program Has Not Improved Plan Quality

被引:15
作者
Markovitz, Adam A. [1 ,2 ]
Ayanian, John Z. [3 ,4 ]
Sukul, Devraj [5 ]
Ryan, Andrew M. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Dept Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Dept Internal Med, Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Med Sch, Internal Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Management & Policy, Hlth Care Management, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Ctr Evaluating Hlth Reform, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
PAYMENTS;
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00606
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2012 Medicare introduced the quality bonus program, linking financial bonuses to commercial insurers' quality performance in Medicare Advantage (MA). Despite large investments in the program, evidence of its effectiveness is limited. We analyzed insurance claims from the period 2009-2018 from the nation's largest MA claims database for 3,753,117 MA beneficiaries (treatment group) and 4,025,179 commercial enrollees (control group). Using a difference-in-differences framework, we evaluated changes in performance on nine claims-based measures of quality in both groups before and after the start of the bonus program and with adjustment for differential pre-period trends. We observed no consistent differential improvement in quality for MA versus commercial enrollees under the quality bonus program. Program participation was associated with significant quality improvements among MA beneficiaries on four measures, significant declines on four other measures, and no significant change in overall quality performance (+0.6 percentage points). Together, these results suggest that the quality bonus program did not produce the intended improvement in overall quality performance of MA plans.
引用
收藏
页码:1918 / 1925
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Medicare 2018 Part C and Part D Star Ratings Technical Notes
[2]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2021, PERF DAT C
[3]  
Congressional Budget Office, 2018, RED QUAL BON PAYM ME
[4]   Comparing Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting and Instrumental Variable Methods for the Evaluation of Adenosine Diphosphate Receptor Inhibitors After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [J].
Federspiel, Jerome J. ;
Anstrom, Kevin J. ;
Xian, Ying ;
Mccoy, Lisa A. ;
Effron, Mark B. ;
Faries, Douglas E. ;
Zettler, Marjorie ;
Mauri, Laura ;
Yeh, Robert W. ;
Peterson, Eric D. ;
Wang, Tracy Y. .
JAMA CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 1 (06) :655-665
[5]  
Fioretti M, 2019, SUBSIDIZING INEQUALI, V2019-15
[6]  
For bonus payments from the period 2012-14 L&M Policy Research, 2016, HHSM500201100083C L
[7]  
Freed M., 2021, MED ADVANTAGE 2021 E
[8]   Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing [J].
Goodman-Bacon, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2021, 225 (02) :254-277
[9]   Databases for surgical health services research: Clinformatics Data Mart [J].
Gunaseelan, Vidhya ;
Kenney, Brooke ;
Lee, Jay Soong-Jin ;
Hu, Hsou Mei .
SURGERY, 2019, 165 (04) :669-671
[10]  
Henry J., MED ADV PLAN STAR RA