Perspective-taking and gift-giving in Chinese preschool children

被引:3
作者
Guan, Yao [1 ,2 ]
Deak, Gedeon O. [3 ]
Huangfu, Baihui [1 ]
Xu, Zhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Univ, Fac Psychol, 2 Tiansheng Rd, Chongqing 400715, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Psychol, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Cognit Sci, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cross-cultural; executive function; moral development; perspective-taking; prosocial behaviour; INHIBITORY CONTROL; PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; SEX-DIFFERENCES; SELF-CONTROL; KNOWLEDGE; MIND; PSYCHOLOGY; CULTURE; EMPATHY;
D O I
10.1111/sode.12405
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
This study explored Chinese preschool children's perspective-taking via a gift-giving paradigm. Unlike findings with North American children (Atance et al. in, Dev Psychol 46:1505-1513, 2010), the results from two experiments (N-Exp. 1 = 329; N-Exp. 2 = 112) showed that allowing Chinese children to first choose a desired object for themselves did not enhance their subsequent perspective-taking performance in gift selection or gift justifications. This was true regardless of gift type (consumable or recreational items) or of recipient (mom, teacher, experimenter, or friend). In addition, children's perspective-taking did not correlate with their performances in behavioral inhibition and delay of gratification tasks. These results suggest the possibility that the prior desire fulfillment effect varies with children's socio-cultural experiences. Finally, Chinese children showed better perspective-taking in choosing consumable gifts (e.g., drinks, snacks) than recreational gifts (e.g., toys, magazines), although this effect was not found for gift selection in Experiment 2. One interpretation of these results is that children's capacity for prosocial perspective-taking is influenced by socio-cultural experiences and social knowledge about individuals' preferences for different kinds of objects.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 56
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Tracking the impact of depression in a perspective-taking task [J].
Ferguson, Heather J. ;
Cane, James .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[22]   Perspective-taking as an organizational capability [J].
Litchfield, Robert C. ;
Gentry, Richard J. .
STRATEGIC ORGANIZATION, 2010, 8 (03) :187-205
[23]   Contractualism and the Significance of Perspective-Taking [J].
Timmerman, Peter .
ETHICAL THEORY AND MORAL PRACTICE, 2015, 18 (05) :909-925
[24]   Taking the point of view of the blind: Spontaneous level-2 perspective-taking in irrelevant conditions [J].
Quesque, Francois ;
Chabanat, Eric ;
Rossetti, Yves .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 79 :356-364
[25]   Perspective-Taking and Social Inferences in Adolescents, Young Adults, and Older Adults [J].
De Lillo, Martina ;
Ferguson, Heather J. J. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2023, 152 (05) :1420-1438
[26]   The cognitive demands of remembering a speaker's perspective and managing common ground size modulate 8-and 10-year-olds' perspective-taking abilities [J].
Zhao, Lin ;
Wang, J. Jessica ;
Apperly, Ian A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 174 :130-149
[27]   Measuring Spatial Abilities in Children: A Comparison of Mental-Rotation and Perspective-Taking Tasks [J].
Frick, Andrea ;
Pichelmann, Stefan .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 11 (08)
[28]   Individual differences in switching and inhibition predict perspective-taking across the lifespan [J].
Long, Madeleine R. ;
Horton, William S. ;
Rohde, Hannah ;
Sorace, Antonella .
COGNITION, 2018, 170 :25-30
[29]   When the shoe does not fit: The role of perspective-taking orientation in a perspective-taking prejudice reduction intervention [J].
Szekeres, Hanna ;
Lantos, Nora Anna ;
Farago, Laura ;
Nyul, Boglarka ;
Kende, Anna .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY & APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 34 (02)
[30]   Teaching a perspective-taking component skill to children with autism in the natural environment [J].
Welsh, Fernanda ;
Najdowski, Adel C. ;
Strauss, Danielle ;
Gallegos, Lindabeth ;
Fullen, Jesse A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2019, 52 (02) :439-450