The anatomical relationship between the roots of erupted permanent teeth and the mandibular canal: a systematic review

被引:8
作者
Pucilo, Michal [1 ]
Lipski, Mariusz [2 ]
Sroczyk-Jaszczynska, Magdalena [3 ]
Pucilo, Aleksandra [4 ]
Nowicka, Alicja [5 ]
机构
[1] Individual Dent Practice, Ul Slowacka 6c-12, PL-65943 Zielona Gora, Poland
[2] Pomeranian Med Univ, Dept Preclin Conservat Dent & Preclin Endodont, Al Powstancow Wlkp 72, PL-70111 Szczecin, Poland
[3] Pomeranian Med Univ, Dept Gen & Dent Radiol, Al Powstancow Wlkp 72, PL-70111 Szczecin, Poland
[4] Univ Hosp Zielona Gora, Ul Zyty 26, PL-65046 Zielona Gora, Poland
[5] Pomeranian Med Univ, Dept Conservat Dent & Endodont, Al Powstancow Wlkp 72, PL-70111 Szczecin, Poland
关键词
Cone beam computed tomography; Inferior alveolar nerve; Mandibular canal; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; INFERIOR ALVEOLAR NERVE; VOXEL SIZE; 3RD MOLAR; APICES; CBCT; PROXIMITY; MAXILLARY; LOCATION; POSITION;
D O I
10.1007/s00276-019-02404-7
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
Purpose This study reviewed the literature on the position of the mandibular canal (MC) relative to the root apices (RA) of neighbouring teeth using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods The authors searched the PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source, Cochrane and Lilacs databases for relevant English-language articles with no year limitations published through January 25, 2018. Results The search identified 888 articles, 12 of which met the inclusion criteria. Three groups were found based on the measuring method: the shortest distance from the RA to the MC, the vertical distance from the RA to the MC, or the distance from the RA to the superior cortical bone of the MC. In the first and second groups, the shortest distances to the canines, first premolars, second premolars, first molars, second molars, and third molars were 3.8 mm, 4.76 mm, 1.65 mm, 1.23 mm, 0.64 mm, and 1.28 mm, respectively. In the third group, the shortest distances to the second premolars, first molars, and second molars were 2.71 mm, 3.82 mm, and 1.4 mm, respectively. Conclusions The distance from the MC to the RA was generally shorter in females and younger people, with decreasing distances in patients over 60 years old, and depended on the tooth type.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 542
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]   Morphological variations of the mandibular canal in digital panoramic radiographs: a retrospective study in a Chilean population [J].
Fuentes, R. ;
Arias, A. ;
Farfan, C. ;
Astete, N. ;
Garay, I ;
Navarro, P. ;
Dias, F. J. .
FOLIA MORPHOLOGICA, 2019, 78 (01) :163-170
[12]   The accuracy of linear measurements of maxillary and mandibular edentulous sites in cone-beam computed tomography images with different fields of view and voxel sizes under simulated clinical conditions [J].
Ganguly, Rumpa ;
Ramesh, Aruna ;
Pagni, Sarah .
IMAGING SCIENCE IN DENTISTRY, 2016, 46 (02) :93-101
[13]   Risk Management in Endodontics [J].
Givol, Navot ;
Rosen, Eyal ;
Taicher, Shlomo ;
Tsesis, Igor .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2010, 36 (06) :982-984
[14]   Anatomic study of the position of the mandibular canal and corresponding mandibular third molar on cone-beam computed tomography images [J].
Gu, Liqun ;
Zhu, Chao ;
Chen, Kejia ;
Liu, Xianchu ;
Tang, Zhangui .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2018, 40 (06) :609-614
[15]  
Harada Nana, 2015, Bull Tokyo Dent Coll, V56, P1, DOI 10.2209/tdcpublication.56.1
[16]  
Hazza'a Abdalla M, 2006, J Contemp Dent Pract, V7, P71
[17]  
Hiremath Hemalatha, 2016, Indian J Dent Res, V27, P312, DOI 10.4103/0970-9290.186240
[18]  
Joanna Briggs Institute, 2014, REV MAN
[19]   Relationships between third-molar juxta-apical radiolucencies and mandibular canals in panoramic and cone beam computed tomography images [J].
Kapila, Rishabh ;
Harada, Nana ;
Araki, Kazuyuki ;
Sano, Tsukasa ;
Goto, Tazuko K. .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 117 (05) :640-644
[20]   Proximity of the Mandibular Canal to Teeth and Cortical Bone [J].
Kawashima, Yusuke ;
Sakai, Osamu ;
Shosho, Dhurata ;
Kaneda, Takashi ;
Gohel, Anita .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2016, 42 (02) :221-224