The structure of disgust: domain specificity in relation to contamination ideation and excessive washing

被引:70
作者
Olatunji, BO
Williams, NL
Lohr, JM
Sawchuk, CN
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Psychol, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
disgust; core; animal reminder; contamination ideation; washing; OCD;
D O I
10.1016/j.brat.2004.08.002
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The primary goal of the present study was to employ confirmatory factor analysis to compare two theoretical models regarding the factor structure of disgust (N = 307). The two-factor model of Animal Reminder and Core disgust proposed by Rozin et al. (2000) demonstrated superior model fit over a one-factor model that has been implicated in prior research. However, contrary to theoretical predictions, categorizing Hygiene disgust as Core disgust rather than Animal Reminder disgust provided an overall better fit for the two-factor model. The second aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between the empirically derived two-factor model and contamination ideation and excessive washing using structural equation modeling. Findings indicated that the Contamination Ideation and Excessive Washing latent factor was specifically related to Core disgust (domain specific) and negatively related to Animal Reminder disgust. The relevance of these findings in the context of future research investigating the role of disgust in specific anxiety disorders is discussed. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1069 / 1086
页数:18
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE - A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED 2-STEP APPROACH
    ANDERSON, JC
    GERBING, DW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) : 411 - 423
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1993, HDB EMOTIONS
  • [3] Disgust sensitivity and the sex difference in fears to common indigenous animals
    Arrindell, WA
    Mulkens, S
    Kok, J
    Vollenbroek, J
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1999, 37 (03) : 273 - 280
  • [4] PHOBIC DIMENSIONS .3. FACTOR ANALYTIC APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF COMMON PHOBIC FEARS - AN UPDATED REVIEW OF FINDINGS OBTAINED WITH ADULT SUBJECTS
    ARRINDELL, WA
    PICKERSGILL, MJ
    MERCKELBACH, H
    ARDON, AM
    CORNET, FC
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1991, 13 (02): : 73 - 130
  • [5] Bentler P.M., 1989, EQS STRUCTURAL EQUAT
  • [6] BENTLER PM, 1980, PSYCHOL BULL, V88, P588, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
  • [7] Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: Multiple factors or method effects?
    Brown, TA
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 2003, 41 (12) : 1411 - 1426
  • [8] Browne M., 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E, P136, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0049124192021002005, 10.1177/0049124192021002005]
  • [9] Revision of the Padua Inventory of obsessive compulsive disorder symptoms: Distinctions between worry, obsessions, and compulsions
    Burns, GL
    Keortge, SG
    Formea, GM
    Sternberger, LG
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1996, 34 (02) : 163 - 173
  • [10] BYRNE BM, 1989, PRIMER LISREL