Methods for modelling excess mortality across England during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:15
作者
Barnard, Sharmani [1 ,2 ]
Chiavenna, Chiara [3 ]
Fox, Sebastian [1 ]
Charlett, Andre [3 ]
Waller, Zachary [1 ]
Andrews, Nick [3 ]
Goldblatt, Peter [4 ]
Burton, Paul [5 ]
De Angelis, Daniela [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Publ Hlth England, Hlth Improvement, Wellington House,133-155 Waterloo Rd, London SE1 8UG, England
[2] Univ Western Australia, Telethon Kids Inst, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Publ Hlth England, Stat Modelling & Econ Dept SMED, Natl Infect Serv, Data & Analyt Sci, London, England
[4] UCL Inst Hlth Inequal, London, England
[5] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[6] Univ Cambridge, Sch Clin Med, MRC Biostat Unit, Cambridge, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
COVID-19; coronavirus; all cause mortality; excess deaths;
D O I
10.1177/09622802211046384
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Excess mortality is an important measure of the scale of the coronavirus-2019 pandemic. It includes both deaths caused directly by the pandemic, and deaths caused by the unintended consequences of containment such as delays to accessing care or postponements of healthcare provision in the population. In 2020 and 2021, in England, multiple groups have produced measures of excess mortality during the pandemic. This paper describes the data and methods used in five different approaches to estimating excess mortality and compares their estimates. The fundamental principles of estimating excess mortality are described, as well as the key commonalities and differences between five approaches. Two of these are based on the date of registration: a quasi-Poisson model with offset and a 5-year average; and three are based on date of occurrence: a Poisson model without offset, the European monitoring of excess mortality model and a synthetic controls model. Comparisons between estimates of excess mortality are made for the period March 2020 through March 2021 and for the two waves of the pandemic that occur within that time-period. Model estimates are strikingly similar during the first wave of the pandemic though larger differences are observed during the second wave. Models that adjusted for reduced circulation of winter infection produced higher estimates of excess compared with those that did not. Models that do not adjust for reduced circulation of winter infection captured the effect of reduced winter illness as a result of mobility restrictions during the period. None of the estimates captured mortality displacement and therefore may underestimate excess at the current time, though the extent to which this has occurred is not yet identified. Models use different approaches to address variation in data availability and stakeholder requirements of the measure. Variation between estimates reflects differences in the date of interest, population denominators and parameters in the model relating to seasonality and trend.
引用
收藏
页码:1790 / 1802
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Campbell A., 2020, The West Australian
[2]  
Chiavenna, 2020, THESIS U CAMBRIDGE
[3]  
EuroMOMO, 2021, WEEK
[4]  
Favelle L, 2021, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V26
[5]  
George EI, 1997, STAT SINICA, V7, P339
[6]   Collateral damage of COVID-19-lockdown in Germany: decline of NSTE-ACS admissions [J].
Gitt, A. K. ;
Karcher, A. K. ;
Zahn, R. ;
Zeymer, U. .
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 109 (12) :1585-1587
[7]  
Hohle M., 2021, WEEKL ALL CAUS MORT
[8]   COVID-19: a need for real-time monitoring of weekly excess deaths [J].
Leon, David A. ;
Shkolnikov, Vladimir M. ;
Smeeth, Liam ;
Magnus, Per ;
Pechholdova, Marketa ;
Jarvis, Christopher I. .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10234) :E81-E81
[9]  
Ministry of Justice, 2020, GUID COR SERV BER PE
[10]   The application of a novel 'rising activity, multi-level mixed effects, indicator emphasis' (RAMMIE) method for syndromic surveillance in England [J].
Morbey, Roger A. ;
Elliot, Alex J. ;
Charlett, Andre ;
Verlander, Neville Q. ;
Andrews, Nick ;
Smith, Gillian E. .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2015, 31 (22) :3660-3665