Tacrolimus Intrapatient Variability After Switching From Immediate or Prolonged-Release to Extended-Release Formulation, After an Organ Transplantation

被引:5
|
作者
Del Bello, Arnaud [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gaible, Clotilde [1 ]
Longlune, Nathalie [1 ]
Hebral, Anne-Laure [1 ]
Esposito, Laure [1 ]
Gandia, Peggy [4 ,5 ]
Kamar, Nassim [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Rangueil, Dept Nephrol & Organ Transplantat, Toulouse, France
[2] CHU Purpan, IFRBMT, INSERM, U1043, Toulouse, France
[3] Univ Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
[4] Toulouse Univ Hosp, Pharmacokinet & Toxicol Lab, Toulouse, France
[5] Univ Toulouse, ENVT, INRAE, INTHERES, Toulouse, France
关键词
tacrolimus variability; solid organ transplantation; tacrolimus formulation; extended-release tacrolimus; outcomes; rejection; ANTIBODY-MEDIATED REJECTION; TWICE-DAILY TACROLIMUS; TROUGH BLOOD-LEVELS; ALLOGRAFT PATHOLOGY; PATIENT VARIABILITY; KIDNEY; EXPOSURE;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2021.602764
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Purpose: Several formulations of tacrolimus are available, but evidence of the benefit of changing to the most recent formulations is lacking. Tacrolimus intra-patient variability (tacrolimus IPV) is an emerging risk factor associated with poor graft outcomes after solid organ transplantations. Here, we examined the modifications of tacrolimus IPV after switching to a different formulation of tacrolimus. Experimental Approach: We identified 353 solid organ transplant recipients that were switched in our center from immediate-release (IR-tacrolimus) or prolonged-release tacrolimus (PR-tacrolimus) to extended-release, LCP-tacrolimus (LCP-tacrolimus). Among them, 54 patients underwent at least 3 available tacrolimus blood concentrations before and after the switch, allowing us to investigate tacrolimus IPV. Key Results: The switch was considered as a safe procedure since only four of the 353 patients presented a graft rejection after the switch, and no patient was hospitalized for tacrolimus overdose. The tacrolimus IPV estimated by the coefficient of variation (CV-IPV) was stable before and after the switch to LCP-tacrolimus (CV-IPV: 29.0% (IQR 25-75 (15.5; 38.5) before and 24.0% (15.8; 36.5) after the switch, p = 0.65). Conclusion and Implications: Switching from IR- or PR-tacrolimus to LCP-tacrolimus is a safe procedure. However, the CV-tacrolimus IPV was not impacted by the change of formulation.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Switching From Immediate- or Prolonged-Release to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus (LCPT) on Tremor in Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: The Observational ELIT Study
    Giral, Magali
    Grimbert, Philippe
    Morin, Baptiste
    Bouvier, Nicolas
    Buchler, Matthias
    Dantal, Jacques
    Garrigue, Valerie
    Bertrand, Dominique
    Kamar, Nassim
    Malvezzi, Paolo
    Moreau, Karine
    Athea, Yoni
    Le Meur, Yannick
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 37
  • [2] Early Versus Late Conversion From Immediate to Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus After Renal Transplantation: Clinical Effects and Treatment Costs
    Mendonca, Luis
    Diniz, Hugo
    Silvano, Jose
    Marques, Sofia
    Sampaio, Susana
    Pestana, Manuel
    TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT, 2019, 5 (01):
  • [3] Budget impact of switching from an immediate-release to a prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus in renal transplant recipients in the UK based on differences in adherence
    Muduma, Gorden
    Odeyemi, Isaac
    Smith-Palmer, Jayne
    Pollock, Richard F.
    PATIENT PREFERENCE AND ADHERENCE, 2014, 8 : 391 - 399
  • [4] Comparative pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in stable pediatric allograft recipients converted from immediate-release tacrolimus to prolonged-release tacrolimus formulation
    Rubik, Jacek
    Debray, Dominique
    Iserin, Franck
    Vondrak, Karel
    Sellier-Leclerc, Anne-Laure
    Kelly, Deirdre
    Czubkowski, Piotr
    Webb, Nicholas J. A.
    Riva, Silvia
    D'Antiga, Lorenzo
    Marks, Stephen D.
    Rivet, Christine
    Toenshoff, Burkhard
    Kazeem, Gbenga
    Undre, Nasrullah
    PEDIATRIC TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 23 (04)
  • [5] Pharmacokinetics of prolonged-release tacrolimus versus immediate-release tacrolimus in de novo liver transplantation: A randomized phase III substudy
    Ericzon, Bo-Goran
    Varo, Evaristo
    Trunecka, Pavel
    Fischer, Lutz
    Colledan, Michele
    Gridelli, Bruno
    Valdivieso, Andres
    O'Grady, John
    Dickinson, James
    Undre, Nasrullah
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 31 (06)
  • [6] A report of a prospective randomized trial of extended-release tacrolimus versus immediate release tacrolimus after liver transplantation with anti-thymocyte induction in a steroid free protocol
    Helmick, Ryan A.
    Eymard, Corey M.
    Naik, Surabhi
    Eason, James D.
    Nezakatgoo, Nosratollah
    Nair, Satheesh
    Vanatta, Jason M.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 38 (01)
  • [7] Conversion From Once-Daily Prolonged-Release Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Extended-Release Tacrolimus in Stable Liver Transplant Recipients
    Altieri, Mario
    Delaval, Guillaume
    Kimmoun, Elisabeth
    Allaire, Manon
    Salame, Ephrem
    Dumortier, Jerome
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 16 (03) : 321 - 325
  • [8] Evaluating the conversion to extended-release tacrolimus from immediate-release tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients
    Choi, David
    Thaker, Sarang
    West-Thielke, Patricia
    Elmasri, Annesti
    Chan, Christine
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 33 (08) : 1124 - 1128
  • [9] Tacrolimus Effects and Side Effects After Liver Transplantation: Is There a Difference Between Immediate and Extended Release?
    Weiler, N.
    Thrun, I.
    Eberlin, M.
    Foltys, D.
    Heise, M.
    Hoppe-Lotichius, M.
    Zimmermann, T.
    Kraemer, I.
    Otto, G.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 45 (06) : 2321 - 2325
  • [10] Extended-release tacrolimus tablets for preventing organ transplant rejection
    Horwedel, Timothy A.
    Brennan, Daniel C.
    EXPERT OPINION ON ORPHAN DRUGS, 2016, 4 (10): : 1079 - 1086