Evaluation of tunnel safety: towards an economic safety optimum

被引:37
作者
Arends, BJ
Jonkman, SN [1 ]
Vrijling, JK
van Gelder, PHAJM
机构
[1] Rijkswaterstaat, Minist Transport Publ Works & Water Management, Ctr Tunnel Safety, Civil Engn Div, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn, Sect Hydraul Engn, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
tunnel safety; cost effectiveness; economic optimisation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2005.01.007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to propose a method for the evaluation of tunnel safety using probabilistic risk assessment. The framework includes three criteria; personal-, societal- and economic risk. The use of personal and societal risk is becoming more and more widespread. There are however, still some difficulties in using the economic risk criterion. As a first step towards economic risk optimisation, the cost effectiveness of addition and removal of safety measures in tunnels is investigated. Finally, the application of the three proposed criteria is further discussed for some tunnelling projects currently underway in the Netherlands. (C) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 228
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
ARENDS BJ, 2003, THESIS U TECHNOLOGY
[2]  
BOHNENBLUST H, 1998, QUANTITIFED SOC RISK
[3]  
BROEREN PTW, 2003, BOMVIT BESLISSINGS O
[4]   Safety of long railway tunnels [J].
Diamantidis, D ;
Zuccarelli, F ;
Westhäuser, A .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2000, 67 (02) :135-145
[5]  
Dionne G, 2004, J TRANSP ECON POLICY, V38, P247
[6]   The Channel Tunnel Safety Authority [J].
Eisner, HS .
SAFETY SCIENCE, 2000, 36 (01) :1-18
[7]  
GEYER TAW, 1996, P 1996 ANN M SOC RIS
[8]  
HAMMIT JK, 2000, PUBLISHED RISK PERSP, V8
[9]  
*ICF, 2002, COSTS BENEFITS REHAB
[10]  
KAMER T, 1996, RISICONORMERING GEVA