Comparison of laparoscopic, open, and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis

被引:89
作者
Piskun, G [1 ]
Kozik, D [1 ]
Rajpal, S [1 ]
Shaftan, G [1 ]
Fogler, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Brookdale Univ Hosp & Med Ctr, Dept Surg Serv, Brooklyn, NY 11229 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2001年 / 15卷 / 07期
关键词
conversion; laparoscopic appendectomy; perforated appendicitis;
D O I
10.1007/s004640020072
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Perforated appendicitis is associated with a significant risk of postoperative abdominal and wound infection. Only a few controversial studies evaluate the role of laparoscopy in perforated appendicitis. The significance of conversion from laparoscopy to open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis is not well defined. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test. Methods: Data on 52 patients with perforated appendicitis were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Among these patients, 18 had laparoscopic appendectomies (LA); 24 had open appendectomies (OA); and 10 had converted appendectomies (CA). The indications for either method were based on the attending surgeons's philosophy. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed using a retro-grade stapler technique. Operative time, hospital stay, ability to tolerate a liquid diet, and postoperative infectious complications were documented. Results: No statistically significant difference in the operative time in minutes was found between the LA (114 +/- 29.3), CA (120.0 +/- 32.2), and OA (105.8 +/- 64.1) groups (p = NS). There was no statistically significance difference in length of stay (days) between the LA (9.2 +/- 4.1), OA (10.5 +/- 3.3), and CA (10.0 +/- 1.8) groups. The wound infection rate was less frequent in the LA group (0%) than in OA (14%) and CA (10%) groups. The rate of intra-abdominal abscess infections (IAAs) and ileus were 22% and 28%, respectively, in LA group, 38% and 29%, respectively, in OA group, and 60% and 50%, respectively, in CA group. Conclusions: No difference in the rate of postoperative intra-abdominal abscesses exists between laparoscopic and open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Wound infections and ileus complicate the postoperative course of patients after laparoscopic appendectomy less frequently than after open appendectomy. The conversion of laparoscopic to open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis is associated with increased postoperative morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 662
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
ADISS DG, 1990, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V132, P910
[2]  
Frazee RC, 1996, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V131, P509
[3]  
GEIS W P, 1992, Contemporary Surgery, V40, P13
[4]  
GEIS WP, 1997, ANN SURG, V225, P252
[5]   Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A prospective randomized trial [J].
Macarulla, E ;
Vallet, J ;
Abad, JM ;
Hussein, H ;
Fernandez, E ;
Nieto, B .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 7 (04) :335-339
[6]   OPEN VERSUS LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED COMPARISON [J].
MARTIN, LC ;
PUENTE, I ;
SOSA, JL ;
BASSIN, A ;
BRESLAW, R ;
MCKENNEY, MG ;
GINZBURG, E ;
SLEEMAN, D .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (03) :256-262
[7]   A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC APPENDECTOMY WITH OPEN APPENDECTOMY [J].
ORTEGA, AE ;
HUNTER, JG ;
PETERS, JH ;
SWANSTROM, LL ;
SCHIRMER, B ;
SANGSTER, W ;
RATTNER, DW ;
FERGUSON, C ;
SOPER, N ;
PETELIN, J ;
UNGER, SW ;
APELGREN, KN ;
ARREGUI, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 169 (02) :208-213
[8]   Laparoscopic stapler appendectomy - A prospective study of 267 consecutive cases [J].
Wagner, M ;
Aronsky, D ;
Tschudi, J ;
Metzger, A ;
Klaiber, C .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 1996, 10 (09) :895-899