Food Security, Safety, and Sustainability-Getting the Trade-Offs Right

被引:154
作者
Vagsholm, Ivar [1 ]
Arzoomand, Naser Shah [2 ]
Boqvist, Sofia [1 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Biomed Sci & Vet Publ Hlth, Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Natl Food Agcy, Div Food Control, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
source reduction; circular food systems; food loss and waste; antimicrobial resistance; BSE; QUANTITATIVE RISK-ASSESSMENT; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; WASTE; BIOSECURITY; MANAGEMENT; OUTBREAK; CJD;
D O I
10.3389/fsufs.2020.00016
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
The United Nations sustainable development goals include eradication of hunger. To feed 10 billion persons 2050, we need to get the trade-offs right between sustainability, food security, food safety, and make better use of food already produced. The hierarchy of strategies for reducing food losses and waste are in descending order source reduction, reusing or reprocessing surplus foods, recycle food as feed for animals, recover the energy as biofuels, nutrients as compost, or raw materials for industry, while as last resorts one may consider recovering the energy by incineration or dumping as garbage in landfills. This paper will explore the trade-offs inherent when aiming at triple goals of sustainability, food security, and safety looking at these strategies for reducing food losses and waste and resource footprints. Intensification of food production and circular food systems could be parts of these solutions to future food security. In this regard could our future trade-offs be informed by the experiences from the use of antimicrobials to intensify food production and from the outbreak of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in terms of circular food production? There is no trade-off between intensification of food production aided by antimicrobials and the public health risks from antimicrobial resistance due to the zoo-technical use of antimicrobials. A sustainable future requires control of antimicrobial resistance. If one avoids that cycles of nutrients become cycles of pathogens and/or hazards, circular food production systems will a major contribution to the future sustainable food security. Source reduction i.e., limiting food losses and waste appears to the strategy most promising for achieving sustainability. By using artificial intelligence and intelligent packaging major progress is possible, with the added benefit of better control of food fraud. A changed diet-eating more plant-based foods and not eating animal protein produced by edible feedstuffs, and source reduction of the food lost or wasted should enable us to feed at least an additional billion persons. Solutions to sustainability and food security should integrate food safety considerations from the start.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Water, Energy, Food, Waste Nexus: Between Synergy and Trade-Offs in Romania Based on Entrepreneurship and Economic Performance
    Petrariu, Radu
    Constantin, Marius
    Dinu, Mihai
    Patarlageanu, Simona Roxana
    Deaconu, Madalina Elena
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (16)
  • [42] Exploring social-ecological trade-offs in fisheries using a coupled food web and human behavior model
    Innes-Gold, Anne A.
    Pavlowich, Tyler
    Heinichen, Margaret
    McManus, M. Conor
    McNamee, Jason
    Collie, Jeremy
    Humphries, Austin T.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 26 (02):
  • [43] Ensuring Compliance From 35,000 Feet: Accountability and Trade-Offs in Aviation Safety Regulatory Networks
    Mills, Russell W.
    Koliba, Christopher J.
    Reiss, Dorit Rubinstein
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2018, 50 (10) : 1478 - 1507
  • [44] Can SMEs in the food industry expect competitive advantages from proactive CSR when CSR trade-offs exist?
    Kim, Yeonsoo
    Bhalla, Nandini
    CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 27 (02) : 304 - 328
  • [45] Ant Colony Optimization Algorithm for understanding of trade-offs between safety and benefit: a case of Beijing taxi service system
    Tian, Jin
    Lin, Zheying
    Wang, Feng
    COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2020, 22 (03) : 489 - 499
  • [46] Food-Carbon Trade-offs between Agriculture and Reforestation Land Uses under Alternate Market-based Policies
    Paterson, Stacey
    Bryan, Brett Anthony
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2012, 17 (03):
  • [47] Analysing trade-offs and synergies between SDGs for urban development, food security and poverty alleviation in rapidly changing peri-urban areas: a tool to support inclusive urban planning
    Dolley, Jonathan
    Marshall, Fiona
    Butcher, Bradley
    Reffin, Jeremy
    Robinson, James Alexander
    Eray, Baris
    Quadrianto, Novi
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2020, 15 (06) : 1601 - 1619
  • [48] Trade-offs of landscape connectivity between regional and interregional ecological security patterns in a junction area of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region
    Liu, Menglin
    Peng, Jian
    Dong, Jianquan
    Jiang, Hong
    Xu, Dongmei
    Meersmans, Jeroen
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2024, 167
  • [49] Better before worse trajectories in food systems? An investigation of synergies and trade-offs through climate-smart agriculture and system dynamics
    Jagustovic, Renata
    Papachristos, George
    Zougmore, Robert B.
    Kotir, Julius H.
    Kessler, Aad
    Ouedraogo, Mathieu
    Ritsema, Coen J.
    Dittmer, Kyle M.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 190
  • [50] Water conservation can reduce future water-energy-food-environment trade-offs in a medium-sized African river basin
    Siderius, C.
    Biemans, H.
    Kashaigili, J.
    Conway, D.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2022, 266