The effect of Holstein-Friesian, Jersey x Holstein-Friesian, and Norwegian Red x (Jersey x Holstein-Friesian) cows on dry matter intake and production efficiencies in pasture-based systems

被引:8
作者
McClearn, B. [1 ,2 ]
Delaby, L. [3 ]
Gilliland, T. J. [2 ]
Galvin, N. [1 ]
Guy, C. [1 ,2 ]
Dineen, M. [1 ]
Coughlan, F. [1 ]
McCarthy, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Teagasc, Anim & Grassland Res & Innovat Ctr, Moorepk, Fermoy P61 C996, Co Cork, Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Inst Global Food Secur, Belfast BT7 1NN, Antrim, North Ireland
[3] INRAE, AgroCampus Ouest, UMR Physiol Environm Genet Anim & Syst Elevage, F-35590 St Gilles, France
关键词
pasture-based systems; dry matter intake; dairy cow genotype; production efficiency; CROSSBRED DAIRY-COWS; MILK-PRODUCTION; BODY CONDITION; VOLUNTARY INTAKE; CONDITION SCORE; GENETIC MERIT; STOCKING RATE; N-ALKANES; PERFORMANCE; HERBAGE;
D O I
10.3168/jds.2021-20801
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of cow genotype and parity on dry matter intake (DMI) and production efficiencies in pasture-based systems. Three dairy cow genotypes were evaluated over 3 yr; 40 Holstein-Friesian (HF), 40 Jersey x HF (JEX), and 40 Norwegian Red x JEX (3WAY) each year, with each genotype grazed in equal numbers on 1 of 4 grazing treatments in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments [diploid or tetraploid perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) with or without white clover (Trifolium repens L.)]. A total of 208 individual cows were used during the experiment. The effect of parity (lactation 1, 2, and 3+) was also evaluated. Individual DMI was estimated 8 times during the study, 3 times in 2015 and in 2017, and twice in 2016, using the n-alkane technique. Days in milk at each DMI measurement period were 64, 110, and 189, corresponding to spring, summer, and autumn. Measures of milk production efficiency calculated were total DMI/100 kg of body weight (BW), milk solids (kg fat + protein; MSo)/100 kg of BW, solids-corrected milk (SCM)/100 kg of BW, and unite fourragere lait (net energy requirements for lactation equivalent of 1 kg of standard air-dry barley; UFL) available for standard (4.0% fat and 3.1% protein content) milk production after accounting for maintenance. During the DMI measurement periods HF had a greater milk yield (23.2 kg/ cow per d) compared with JEX and 3WAY (22.0 and 21.9 kg/cow per d, respectively) but there was no difference in MSo yield. Holstein-Friesian and JEX, and JEX and 3WAY had similar DMI, but HF had greater total DMI than 3WAY (DMI was 17.2, 17.0, and 16.7 kg/cow per d for HF, JEX, and 3WAY, respectively). Jersey x Holstein-Friesian cows were the most efficient for total DMI/100 kg of BW, SCM/100 kg of BW, and MSo/100 kg of BW (3.63, 4.96, and 0.39 kg/kg of BW) compared with HF (3.36, 4.51, and 0.35 kg/kg of BW) and 3WAY (3.45, 4.63, and 0.37 kg/kg of BW), respectively. Unite fourragere lait available for standard milk production after accounting for maintenance was not different among genotypes. As expected, DMI differed significantly among parities with greater parity cows having higher DMI and subsequently higher milk and MSo yield. Although all 3 genotypes achieved high levels of DMI and production efficiency, JEX achieved the highest production efficiency. Some of the efficiency gains (SCM/100 kg of BW, MSo/100 kg of BW, and total DMI/100 kg of BW) achieved with JEX decreased when the third breed was introduced.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 254
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
AOAC, 1990, 973.31 Nitrites in Cured Meat
[2]  
Colorimetric Method, V13
[3]   Production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture [J].
Bargo, F ;
Muller, LD ;
Kolver, ES ;
Delahoy, JE .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2003, 86 (01) :1-42
[4]   Gastrointestinal tract size, total-tract digestibility, and rumen microflora in different dairy cow genotypes [J].
Beecher, M. ;
Buckley, F. ;
Waters, S. M. ;
Boland, T. M. ;
Enriquez-Hidalgo, D. ;
Deighton, M. H. ;
O'Donovan, M. ;
Lewis, E. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2014, 97 (06) :3906-3917
[5]   Breeding the dairy cow of the future: what do we need? [J].
Berry, Donagh P. .
ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2015, 55 (07) :823-837
[6]  
BINES J A, 1976, Livestock Production Science, V3, P115, DOI 10.1016/0301-6226(76)90029-4
[7]   DEVELOPMENT OF PREDICTIVE EQUATIONS FOR MILK-YIELD AND DRY-MATTER INTAKE IN LACTATING COWS [J].
BROWN, CA ;
CHANDLER, PT ;
HOLTER, JB .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1977, 60 (11) :1739-1754
[8]  
Buckley F., 2005, P61
[9]   Crossbreeding: implications for dairy cow fertility and survival [J].
Buckley, F. ;
Lopez-Villalobos, N. ;
Heins, B. J. .
ANIMAL, 2014, 8 :122-133
[10]   The relationship between genetic merit for yield and live weight, condition score, and energy balance of spring calving Holstein Friesian dairy cows on grass based systems of milk production [J].
Buckley, F ;
Dillon, P ;
Rath, M ;
Veerkamp, RF .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2000, 83 (08) :1878-1886