Democratising platform governance in the sharing economy: An analytical framework and initial empirical insights

被引:75
作者
Martin, Chris J. [1 ,5 ]
Upham, Paul [2 ,3 ]
Klapper, Rita [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Dept Geog, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[2] Leuphana Univ, Inst Environm & Sustainabil Commun INFU, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[3] Univ Leeds, Sch Earth & Environm, Sustainabil Res Inst, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Leuphana Univ, Inst Enterprise Dev, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
[5] Univ Manchester, Sch Environm Educ & Dev, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
Sharing economy; Collaborative consumption; Collaborative economy; Platform co-operativism; Platform governance; Platform cooperative; COLLABORATIVE CONSUMPTION; COOPERATIVES; EFFICIENCY; UBER;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.123
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The growing controversy around the adverse impacts of sharing economy platforms, including Airbnb and Uber, has led to calls for more democratic models of platform governance. Advocates of democratic governance models claim that these could help to create a more sustainable sharing economy by ensuring that platforms promote social and environmental values alongside the instrumental values of the capitalist economy. Exploring this claim we bring together theories of platform governance, democratic organisational governance and the enactment of values in socio-technical systems, offering a conceptual framework for analysing emerging democratic models of platform governance. Applying this framework, we present a mixed methods case study focused on Freegle, a platform that enables people to gift unwanted consumer goods locally and one of very few platforms to have sustained a democratic governance model at scale. In particular, we explore the extent to which the social, environmental and instrumental values of platform users and owners have been accommodated in the governance of Freegle. Our findings are broadly supportive of the claims made by advocates of democratic platform governance, although in Freegle's case social and environmental values are rather better accommodated than instrumental values. While we are cautiously optimistic about the potential from a sustainability perspective of democratic platform governance models, we emphasise that major challenges are likely to be faced by those implementing these; and that such models should be complemented by government regulation of the sharing economy. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1395 / 1406
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
[21]   Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing [J].
Bardhi, Fleura ;
Eckhardt, Giana M. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (04) :881-898
[22]   Understanding current and future issues in collaborative consumption: A four-stage Delphi study [J].
Barnes, Stuart J. ;
Mattsson, Jan .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2016, 104 :200-211
[24]   A Muddle of Models of Motivation For Using Peer-to-Peer Economy Systems [J].
Bellotti, Victoria ;
Ambard, Alexander ;
Turner, Daniel ;
Gossmann, Christina ;
Demkova, Kamila ;
Carroll, John M. .
CHI 2015: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD ANNUAL CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2015, :1085-1094
[25]   Sharing and neoliberal discourse: The economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy [J].
Cockayne, Daniel G. .
GEOFORUM, 2016, 77 :73-82
[26]  
Cohen Julie E., 2012, Configuring the Networked Self: Law, Code, and the Play of Everyday Life
[27]   Motivations and Differential Participation in a Community Currency System: The Dynamics Within a Local Social Movement Organization [J].
Collom, Ed .
SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM, 2011, 26 (01) :144-168
[28]  
Cornforth C., 2004, ANN PUBLIC COOPERATI, V75, P11, DOI DOI 10.1111/APCE.2004.75.ISSUE-1
[29]   THE CORPORATE-BOARD - CONFRONTING THE PARADOXES [J].
DEMB, A ;
NEUBAUER, FF .
LONG RANGE PLANNING, 1992, 25 (03) :9-20
[30]  
Dourish P., 2001, Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction