Effects of water stress applied at different phenological phases on yield components of dwarf bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

被引:16
|
作者
Mouhouche, B [1 ]
Ruget, F [1 ]
Delecolle, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Natl Agron, El Harrach Alger 16200, Algeria
来源
AGRONOMIE | 1998年 / 18卷 / 03期
关键词
Phaseolus vulgaris; yield component; water stress; phenological phase;
D O I
10.1051/agro:19980303
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Drought treatments were applied to seven sets of dwarf bean plants in pots. Each was subjected to water stress during one of the seven phenological phases, ranging from bud stage to grain filling. Treatments consisted of withholding irrigation until 80% of the available water capacity was used. Evidence of differential effects of water stress according to the phase of application was obtained by tagging all the floral organs (buds or pods) present during the phase. Fallen tags indicated how many organs had aborted before physiological maturity. Periods of flowering (pl: bud, p2: flower opening, p3: fruiting set) were more sensitive than pod elongation (p4 and p5) and grain filling (p6 and p7) phases. Bud abortion rate was 50% in non-stressed plants and 70% in stressed ones. The final pod number was 53% lower in plants stressed during the pi period (the most sensitive period) than in controls. Pod number was generally much more sensitive to drought than the seed number per pod, which was only 13% lower than in controls for plants stressed during the pi period. ((C) Inra/Elsevier, Paris.).
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 207
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECTS OF WATER STRESS ON THE UPTAKE OF NUTRIENTS BY BEAN SEEDLINGS (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Dogan, Nuray
    Akinci, Sener
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2011, 20 (8A): : 2163 - 2173
  • [2] Responses of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to photosynthetic irradiance levels during three phenological phases
    Worku, W
    Skjelvåg, AO
    Gislerod, HR
    AGRONOMIE, 2004, 24 (05): : 267 - 274
  • [3] Influence of water stress on grain yield and vegetative growth of two cultivars of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
    Boutraa, T
    Sanders, FE
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2001, 187 (04) : 251 - 257
  • [4] Effects of Azospirillum brasilense on root morphology of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under different water regimes
    German, MA
    Burdman, S
    Okon, Y
    Kigel, J
    BIOLOGY AND FERTILITY OF SOILS, 2000, 32 (03) : 259 - 264
  • [5] Effects of Azospirillum brasilense on root morphology of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under different water regimes
    Marcelo A. German
    Saul Burdman
    Y. Okon
    Jaime Kigel
    Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2000, 32 : 259 - 264
  • [6] Yield stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes
    Mekbib, F
    EUPHYTICA, 2003, 130 (02) : 147 - 153
  • [7] The performance of the CROPGRO model for bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) yield simulation
    de Oliveira, Evandro Chaves
    Nogueira da Costa, Jose Maria
    de Paula Junior, Trazilbo Jose
    Marques Ferreira, Williams Pinto
    Justino, Flavio Barbosa
    Neves, Leonardo de Oliveira
    ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY, 2012, 34 (03): : 239 - 246
  • [8] Effect of water stress and plant density on canopy temperature, yield components and protein concentration of red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Akhtar)
    Asemanrafat, M.
    Honar, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2017, 11 (02) : 241 - 258
  • [9] EFFECTS OF IRRIGATION AND NITROGEN ON YIELD AND WATER PRODUCTIVITY IN COMMON BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.) AND COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA L.) IN NORTH OF IRAN
    Nouralinezhad, A.
    Babazadeh, H.
    Amiri, E.
    Sedghi, H.
    APPLIED ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2018, 16 (03): : 3113 - 3129
  • [10] Effects of heat stress and hypoxia on growth, water relations and ABA levels in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) seedlings
    Incrocci, L
    Pardossi, A
    Vernieri, P
    Tognoni, F
    Serra, G
    XXV INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, PROCEEDINGS - PT 6: CULTURE TECHNIQUES WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES IN PLANTS, 2000, (516): : 31 - 39