Pharmacological Human Enhancement: An Overview of the Looming Bioethical and Regulatory Challenges

被引:19
作者
Ricci, Giovanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Camerino, Sch Law, Sect Forens Med, Camerino, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2020年 / 11卷
关键词
cognitive enhancement; human enhancement; smart drugs; nootropics; bioethics; PRESCRIPTION STIMULANTS; COGNITIVE ENHANCEMENT; STATIC EVOLUTION; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; ITALIAN CODE; SMART DRUGS; NEUROSCIENCE;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00053
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Cognitive enhancement, a rather broad-ranging principle, can be achieved in various ways: healthy eating and consistent physical exercise can lead to long-term improvements in many cognitive domains; commonplace stimulants such as caffeine, on the other hand, temporarily raise levels of alertness, attentiveness, and concentration; sedative substances are also used as an indirect form of enhancement to relax before an exam or an important meeting. Such approaches raise no ethical issue. Nonetheless, clinical research has led to the off-label use of drugs called nootropics or "smart drugs", which can, under certain conditions, elicit some degree of cognition-improving effects: methylphenidate and modafinil can enhance working memory and concentration in healthy individuals, although the significance and effectiveness of such applications are dubious. Such "cognitive enhancement" methods, however, do raise multiple ethical issues, and their contentious nature has caused bioethical authorities to lay out opinions and recommendations meant to regulate their use. Most notably, the Italian Committee on Bioethics has extensively dealt with the spread of nootropics, which resulted in the Italian Code of Medical Ethics including "cognitive enhancement" drugs and their prescription by doctors as critical points, along with cosmetic surgery (the latest version of the Code, updated in December 2017, deals with the two separately, in Article 76 and 76 BIS). The United States Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues broadened the scope of cognitive enhancement techniques so as to include neural modifiers, i.e. mechanisms of brain and nervous system change: a much wider array of interventions, technologies, behaviors, and environmental conditions that may potentially affect several aspects of the human brain and nervous system. The potential of neuroscience to profoundly reshape society is nothing short of mind-blowing.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [31] Augmented memory: a survey of the approaches to remembering more
    Madan, Christopher R.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [32] Marinelli S, 2019, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V23, P6005, DOI 10.26355/eurrev_201907_18408
  • [33] Adolescent Rats Show Cognitive Rigidity in a Test of Attentional Set Shifting
    Newman, Lori A.
    McGaughy, Jill
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOBIOLOGY, 2011, 53 (04) : 391 - 401
  • [34] Smart Drugs "As Common As Coffee": Media Hype about Neuroenhancement
    Partridge, Bradley J.
    Bell, Stephanie K.
    Lucke, Jayne C.
    Yeates, Sarah
    Hall, Wayne D.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (11):
  • [35] Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, 2015, PRESIDENTIAL COMMISS
  • [36] What should we do about student use of cognitive enhancers? An analysis of current evidence
    Ragan, C. Ian
    Bard, Imre
    Singh, Ilina
    [J]. NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 64 : 588 - 595
  • [37] Ricci S, 2016, EUR REV MED PHARMACO, V20, P2753
  • [38] Roache R., 2016, The ethics of human enhancement: Understanding the debate
  • [39] A survey of substance use for cognitive enhancement by university students in the Netherlands
    Schelle, Kimberly J.
    Olthof, Bas M. J.
    Reintjes, Wesley
    Bundt, Carsten
    Gusman-Vermeer, Joyce
    van Mil, Anke C. C. M.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9
  • [40] Cognitive enhancement kept within contexts: neuroethics and informed public policy
    Shook, John R.
    Galvagni, Lucia
    Giordano, James
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN SYSTEMS NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8