Intravascular ultrasound characteristics in patients with intermediate coronary lesions and borderline fractional flow reserve measurements

被引:1
作者
Yang, Hyoung-Mo [1 ]
Lim, Hong-Seok [1 ]
Seo, Kyoung-Woo [1 ]
Choi, Byoung-Joo [1 ]
Choi, So-Yeon [1 ]
Yoon, Myeong-Ho [1 ]
Hwang, Gyo-Seung [1 ]
Tahk, Seung-Jea [1 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ, Dept Cardiol, Sch Med, 164 Worldcup Ro, Suwon 16499, South Korea
关键词
borderline fractional flow reserve; intravascular ultrasound; plaque volume; ARTERY-DISEASE; CARDIAC-CATHETERIZATION; MEDICAL THERAPY; REVASCULARIZATION; INTERVENTION; STENOSIS; ANGIOGRAPHY; CARDIOLOGY; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000011901
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Revascularization of borderline fractional flow reserve (FFR) is controversial and the morphologic characteristics of borderline FFR lesions are not well known. The objective of this study was to determine the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) characteristics in intermediate coronary lesions with borderline FFR in patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis (40%-70% diameter stenosis). Both IVUS and FFR were performed in a total of 228 left anterior descending arteries. We divided them into 3 groups by FFR value: ischemic (n=46, FFR < 0.75), borderline (n=71, FFR 0.75 to <= 0.80), and non-ischemic (n= 111, FFR> 0.80). We compared the IVUS parameters, including minimum lumen area, lesion length, plaque burden, and volumetric analysis among the 3 groups. In the IVUS analysis, the minimum lumen area was smaller (2.5 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.7 vs. 3.4 +/- 1.2 mm(2), P < .001); lesion length was longer (23.6 +/- 8.4 vs. 23.6 +/- 7.4 vs. 17.4 +/- 6.8 mm, P < .001); plaque burden was larger (76.1 +/- 9.6 vs. 73.9 +/- 7.5 vs. 69.8 +/- 9.5%, P < .001); plaque volume was larger (173.0 +/- 78.3 vs. 167.7 +/- 75.0 vs. 129.5 +/- 79.1 mm(3), P < .01); and percent atheroma volume was larger (57.9 +/- 7.5 vs. 57.6 +/- 6.6 vs. 53.9 +/- 8.0%, P < .01) in the ischemic and borderline groups compared with the non-ischemic group, respectively. However, post-hoc analyses showed there were no significant differences between the ischemic and borderline group for all IVUS parameters. There were no differences in IVUS characteristics between borderline and functionally significant FFR, but the amount of atheromatous plaque was more severe in these 2 groups than in the non-ischemic group.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Austen WG, 1975, CIRCULATION, V51, P5, DOI DOI 10.1161/01.CIR.51.4.5
[2]   Comparison of medical treatment and coronary revascularization in patients with moderate coronary lesions and borderline fractional flow reserve measurements [J].
Courtis, Javier ;
Rodes-Cabau, Josep ;
Larose, Eric ;
Dery, Jean-Pierre ;
Nguyen, Can Manh ;
Proulx, Guy ;
Gleeton, Onil ;
Roy, Louis ;
Barbeau, Gerald ;
Noel, Bernard ;
DeLarochelliere, Robert ;
Bertrand, Olivier F. .
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2008, 71 (04) :541-548
[3]   Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI versus Medical Therapy in Stable Coronary Disease [J].
De Bruyne, Bernard ;
Pijls, Nico H. J. ;
Kalesan, Bindu ;
Barbato, Emanuele ;
Tonino, Pim A. L. ;
Piroth, Zsolt ;
Jagic, Nikola ;
Mobius-Winckler, Sven ;
Rioufol, Gilles ;
Witt, Nils ;
Kala, Petr ;
MacCarthy, Philip ;
Engstrom, Thomas ;
Oldroyd, Keith G. ;
Mavromatis, Kreton ;
Manoharan, Ganesh ;
Verlee, Peter ;
Frobert, Ole ;
Curzen, Nick ;
Johnson, Jane B. ;
Jueni, Peter ;
Fearon, William F. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 367 (11) :991-1001
[4]   RELATION BETWEEN MYOCARDIAL FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE CALCULATED FROM CORONARY PRESSURE MEASUREMENTS AND EXERCISE-INDUCED MYOCARDIAL-ISCHEMIA [J].
DEBRUYNE, B ;
BARTUNEK, J ;
SYS, SU ;
HEYNDRICKX, GR .
CIRCULATION, 1995, 92 (01) :39-46
[5]   Coronary physiology revisited - Practical insights from the cardiac catheterization laboratory [J].
Kern, MJ .
CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (11) :1344-1351
[6]   Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory - A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology [J].
Kern, Morton J. ;
Lerman, Amir ;
Bech, Jan-Willen ;
De Bruyne, Bernard ;
Eeckhout, Eric ;
Fearon, William F. ;
Higano, Stuart T. ;
Lim, Michael J. ;
Meuwissen, Martijn ;
Piek, Jan J. ;
Pijls, Nico H. J. ;
Siebes, Maria ;
Spaan, Jos A. E. .
CIRCULATION, 2006, 114 (12) :1321-1341
[7]   Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound Criteria and Their Accuracy for Defining the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Stenoses of Different Locations [J].
Koo, Bon-Kwon ;
Yang, Hyoung-Mo ;
Doh, Jun-Hyung ;
Choe, Hyunmin ;
Lee, Sung-Yun ;
Yoon, Chang-Hwan ;
Cho, Yun-Kyeong ;
Nam, Chang-Wook ;
Hur, Seung-Ho ;
Lim, Hong-Seok ;
Yoon, Myeong-Ho ;
Park, Kyung-Woo ;
Na, Sang-Hoon ;
Youn, Tae-Jin ;
Chung, Woo-Young ;
Ma, Seunghyun ;
Park, Sue-Kyung ;
Kim, Hyo-Soo ;
Tahk, Seung-Jea .
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2011, 4 (07) :803-811
[8]   Use of fractional flow reserve versus stress perfusion scintigraphy after unstable angina - Effect on duration of hospitalization, cost, procedural characteristics, and clinical outcome [J].
Leesar, MA ;
Abdul-Baki, T ;
Akkus, NI ;
Sharma, A ;
Kannan, T ;
Bolli, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (07) :1115-1121
[9]   One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty [J].
Legalery, P ;
Schiele, F ;
Seronde, MF ;
Meneveau, N ;
Wei, H ;
Didier, K ;
Blonde, MC ;
Caulfield, F ;
Bassand, JP .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (24) :2623-2629
[10]   Clinical Outcome Following Conservative vs Revascularization Therapy in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Borderline Fractional Flow Reserve Measurements [J].
Lindstaedt, Michael ;
Halilcavusogullari, Yasemin ;
Yazar, Aydan ;
Holland-Letz, Tim ;
Bojara, Waldemar ;
Muegge, Andreas ;
Germing, Alfried .
CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 33 (02) :77-83