A new logistic regression approach for the evaluation of diagnostic test results

被引:42
作者
Janssens, ACJW [1 ]
Deng, YZ [1 ]
Borsboom, GJJM [1 ]
Eijkemans, MJC [1 ]
Habbema, JDF [1 ]
Steyerberg, EW [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Dept Publ Hlth, Ctr Clin Decis Sci, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
logistic regression; likelihood ratio; prior probability; risk profile; diagnostic test; Bayes theorem; multiple testing;
D O I
10.1177/0272989X05275154
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The value of a dichotomous diagnostic testis often described in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs). Although it is known that these test characteristics vary between subgroups of patients, they are generally interpreted, on overage, without considering information on patient characteristics, such as clinical signs and symptoms, or on previous test results. This article presents are formulation of the logistic regression model that allows to calculate the LRs of diagnostic test results conditional on these covariates. The proposed method starts with estimating logistic regression models for the prior and posterior odds of disease. The regression model for the prior odds is based on patient characteristics, whereas the regression model for the posterior odds also includes the diagnostic test of interest. Following the Bayes theorem, the authors demontsrate that the regression model for the LR can be derived am taking the differences between the regression coefficients of the 2 models. In a clinical example, they demonstrate that the LRs of positive and negative test results and the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic test varied considerably between patients with different risk profiles, even when a constant odds ratio was assumed. The proposed logistic regression approach proves an efficient method to determine the performance of tests at the level of the individual patient risk profile and to examine the effect patient characteristics on diagnostic test characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 177
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] BIASES IN THE ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS
    BEGG, CB
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1987, 6 (04) : 411 - 423
  • [2] SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivation
    Blewitt, Marnie E.
    Gendrel, Anne-Valerie
    Pang, Zhenyi
    Sparrow, Duncan B.
    Whitelaw, Nadia
    Craig, Jeffrey M.
    Apedaile, Anwyn
    Hilton, Douglas J.
    Dunwoodie, Sally L.
    Brockdorff, Neil
    Kay, Graham F.
    Whitelaw, Emma
    [J]. NATURE GENETICS, 2008, 40 (05) : 663 - 669
  • [3] RULING OUT OR RULING IN DISEASE WITH THE MOST SENSITIVE OR SPECIFIC DIAGNOSTIC-TEST - SHORT-CUT OR WRONG TURN
    BOYKO, EJ
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1994, 14 (02) : 175 - 179
  • [4] PATIENT-ORIENTED PERFORMANCE-MEASURES OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS .3. U-FACTOR
    CAIN, KC
    GREENES, RA
    BEGG, CB
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1984, 4 (01) : 33 - 46
  • [5] THE LOGISTIC MODELING OF SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY, AND PREDICTIVE VALUE OF A DIAGNOSTIC-TEST - PRESENTATION
    COUGHLIN, SS
    TROCK, B
    CRIQUI, MH
    PICKLE, LW
    BROWNER, D
    TEFFT, MC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [6] Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9
  • [7] THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE
    HANLEY, JA
    MCNEIL, BJ
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [8] Harrell FE, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO
  • [9] 2-4
  • [10] Harrell Jr F. E, 2001, REGRESSION MODELLING, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-3462-1