Stress constrained topology optimization with free-form design domains

被引:71
作者
Cai, Shouyu [1 ]
Zhang, Weihong [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytech Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Engn Simulat & Aerosp Comp, Xian 710072, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Topology optimization; Stress constraints; Free-form design domain modeler; Topology variation modeler; Finite cell method; LEVEL SET METHOD; FINITE CELL METHOD; STRUCTURAL SHAPE; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; CONTINUUM STRUCTURES; LAYOUT DESIGN; FIXED MESH;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2015.02.012
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper aims at dealing with realistic and challenging design problems of stress constrained topology optimization with freeform design domains. First, the concept of level set function (LSF) based modelers is introduced to transform this kind of problems into the Boolean conjunction operation of a topology variation modeler (TVM) onto a free-form design domain modeler (FDDM). Such an operation is mathematically realized by means of the so-called R-functions in the form of implicit LSFs. Within this framework, topology optimization problems are classified into two general cases depending upon the existence of non-designable solid feature. Analytical sensitivity analysis formulas are further derived. Compared with the existing level set based method, the important sensitivity property of design domain preserving makes it possible to avoid automatically the boundary violation of the design domain caused by the zero level set movement and both the topology and boundary shape of the free-form design domain can be simultaneously optimized. Second, the implementation of the finite cell method (FCM) ensures the stress computing accuracy in the fixed mesh due to the use of high-order shape functions and adaptive integration scheme. The combination of the active-set strategy and the dynamic aggregation technique also reduces the number of local stress constraints greatly. Finally, representative examples are presented to illustrate the conveniences and effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 290
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Structural optimization using sensitivity analysis and a level-set method [J].
Allaire, G ;
Jouve, F ;
Toader, AM .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2004, 194 (01) :363-393
[2]   Topology optimization with implicit functions and regularization [J].
Belytschko, T ;
Xiao, SP ;
Parimi, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2003, 57 (08) :1177-1196
[3]   STRUCTURAL SHAPE OPTIMIZATION WITH GEOMETRIC DESCRIPTION AND ADAPTIVE MESH REFINEMENT [J].
BENNETT, JA ;
BOTKIN, ME .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1985, 23 (03) :458-464
[4]   Topology optimization for minimum weight with compliance and stress constraints [J].
Bruggi, Matteo ;
Duysinx, Pierre .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2012, 46 (03) :369-384
[5]   Stress constrained shape and topology optimization with fixed mesh: A B-spline finite cell method combined with level set function [J].
Cai, Shouyu ;
Zhang, Weihong ;
Zhu, Jihong ;
Gao, Tong .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 278 :361-387
[6]   Shape optimization with topological changes and parametric control [J].
Chen, Jiaqin ;
Shapiro, Vadim ;
Suresh, Krishnan ;
Tsukanov, Igor .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2007, 71 (03) :313-346
[7]   A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000 [J].
Deaton, Joshua D. ;
Grandhi, Ramana V. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2014, 49 (01) :1-38
[8]   The finite cell method for three-dimensional problems of solid mechanics [J].
Duester, A. ;
Parvizian, J. ;
Yang, Z. ;
Rank, E. .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 197 (45-48) :3768-3782
[9]  
Duysinx P, 1998, INT J NUMER METH ENG, V43, P1453
[10]   The extended/generalized finite element method: An overview of the method and its applications [J].
Fries, Thomas-Peter ;
Belytschko, Ted .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2010, 84 (03) :253-304