Follow-up strategies in gynecological oncology: searching appropriateness

被引:16
作者
Zola, P.
Fuso, L.
Mazzola, S.
Gadducci, A.
Landoni, F.
Maggino, T.
Sartori, E.
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Turin, Italy
[2] Inst Canc Res & Treatment, Turin, Italy
[3] Univ Pisa, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Pisa, Italy
[4] European Inst Oncol, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Padua, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Padua, Italy
[6] Univ Brescia, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, Brescia, Italy
关键词
appropriateness; follow-up; gynecological malignancies;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00943.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Nowadays, the cost for oncology diseases is growing rapidly, in particular as a consequence of the introduction of new drugs and new diagnostic procedures, and becoming a considerable percentage of the global healthcare expense. On the other hand, a substantial amount of that cost is considered to be imputable to the follow-up procedures. The aim of our paper is to introduce the debate about follow-up policies adopted in gynecological oncology throughout a literature review just based on cost-effectiveness and cost-efficacy in order to explore if the data are consistent with evidences available in this field. Furthermore, it is discussed if common practice fits the needs of patients, gynecological oncologists, and health service. Despite the fact that in gynecological oncology we must consider different clinical situations concerning each specific neoplasm with their peculiar natural history, some general considerations could be drawn in order to set up future initiatives properly.
引用
收藏
页码:1186 / 1193
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Adlard JW, 2001, CLIN ONCOL-UK, V13, P404
[2]  
Agboola OO, 1997, CAN MED ASSOC J, V157, P879
[3]   Posttherapy surveillance of women with cervical cancer: An outcomes analysis [J].
Bodurka-Bevers, D ;
Morris, M ;
Eifel, PJ ;
Levenback, C ;
Bevers, MW ;
Lucas, KR ;
Wharton, JT .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 78 (02) :187-193
[4]   Cost-effectiveness of routine vaginal cytology for endometrial cancer surveillance [J].
Bristow, Robert E. ;
Purinton, Scott C. ;
Santillan, Antonio ;
Diaz-Montes, Teresa P. ;
Gardner, Ginger J. ;
Giuntoli, Robert L., II .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (02) :709-713
[5]  
Brown ML, 2002, MED CARE, V40, P104
[6]   EVALUATION OF DIRECT MEDICAL COSTS RELATED TO CANCER [J].
BROWN, ML ;
FIREMAN, B .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (06) :399-400
[7]   Extent and determinants of error in doctors' prognoses in terminally ill patients: prospective cohort study [J].
Christakis, NA ;
Lamont, EB .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7233) :469-472
[8]   Paternalism or partnership? [J].
Coulter, A .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7212) :719-720
[9]   Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions [J].
Feldman-Stewart, D ;
Kocovski, N ;
McConnell, BA ;
Brundage, MD ;
Mackillop, WJ .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2000, 20 (02) :228-238
[10]   Does a drug do better when it is new? [J].
Fossati, R ;
Confalonieri, C ;
Apolone, G ;
Cavuto, S ;
Garattini, S .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2002, 13 (03) :470-473