Money and motives: an organizational ecology perspective on private land conservation

被引:36
作者
Clements, Hayley S. [1 ]
Baum, Julia [1 ]
Cumming, Graeme S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town, DST NRF Ctr Excellence, Percy Fitzpatrick Inst, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa
[2] James Cook Univ, ARC Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Conservation organizations; Motives; Organizational ecology; Private land conservation; Profitability; Social-ecological mismatch; SOUTH-AFRICA; BIODIVERSITY; SYSTEMS; INERTIA; NAMIBIA; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2016.03.002
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Analyses of institutions (rules, laws, traditions) and their relevance for conservation are increasingly common in conservation contexts. By contrast, the organizations that operate within the framework provided by institutions are less researched. We applied ideas from organizational ecology to understanding the economic strategies of private land conservation areas (PLCAs), and their sustainability. The biophysical and socioeconomic characteristics of 72 commercially-operated PLCAs in the Eastern and Western Cape Provinces of South Africa were used, via principal components and cluster analyses, to identify alternative business models. We found four distinct business models with different financial productivity and owner objectives. The most profitable models were (1) large ecotourism areas with many charismatic (megaherbivore/predator) and other (antelope) game species, expensive accommodation, and guided activities; and (2) small ecotourism areas with many charismatic game species, fewer other game species, short travel time from the nearest airport, guided activities and day visitors. The less profitable models were (3) hunting reserves, with 54% of owners seeking to generate profits but not doing so, creating a mismatch between financial objectives and financial returns; and (4) PLCAs with few game species and cheap accommodation/activities, which were similarly unprofitable although an absence of financial objectives limited mismatches to just 5%. Biophysical and socioeconomic incompatibilities between different business models make it difficult for PLCAs to change their business model if objectives are not met. Initial (and rational) choices of how to manage a natural resource can thus constrain future management options and the organization's ability to persist in a dynamic environment. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 115
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]  
Baum J.A., 1999, Studying Organization: Theory and Method, P71
[12]   The current and future value of nature-based tourism in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania [J].
Bayliss, Julian ;
Schaafsma, Marije ;
Balmford, Andrew ;
Burgess, Neil D. ;
Green, Jonathan M. H. ;
Madoffe, Seif S. ;
Okayasu, Sana ;
Peh, Kelvin S-H. ;
Platts, Philip J. ;
Yu, Douglas W. .
ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2014, 8 :75-83
[13]  
Berkes Fikret, 2000, LINKING SOCIAL ECOLO
[14]  
Bond I., 2004, Parks in Transition: Biodiversity, Rural Development and the Bottom Line, P29
[15]  
Borcard D, 2011, USE R, P1, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7976-6
[16]  
Bruner AG, 2004, BIOSCIENCE, V54, P1119, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1119:FCASOM]2.0.CO
[17]  
2
[18]  
Cadman MDriver A Maze K Munzhedzi S Peterson C Sekhran N., 2010, BIODIVERSITY DEV S A
[19]  
Cousins JA, 2008, ECOL SOC, V13
[20]  
Cumming GS, 2006, ECOL SOC, V11