Customized dose prescription for permanent prostate brachytherapy: Insights from a multicenter analysis of dosimetry outcomes

被引:74
作者
Stone, Nelson N. [1 ]
Potters, Louis [2 ]
Davis, Brian J. [3 ]
Ciezki, Jay P. [4 ]
Zelefsky, Michael J. [5 ]
Roach, Mack [6 ]
Fearn, Paul A. [5 ]
Kattan, Michael W. [4 ]
Stock, Richard G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[2] S Nassau Communities Hosp, New York Prostate Inst, Oceanside, NY USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
[6] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 69卷 / 05期
关键词
prostate cancer; brachytherapy; external beam radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the biochemical control rate in patients undergoing permanent prostate brachytherapy as a function of the biologically effective dose (BED) and risk group. Methods and Materials: Six centers provided data on 3,928 permanent brachytherapy patients with postimplant dosimetry results. The mean prostate-specific antigen level was 8.9 ng/mL. I-125 was used in 2,293 (58%), Pd-103 in 1,635, and supplemental external beam radiotherapy in 882 (22.5%) patients. The patients were stratified into low- (n = 2,188), intermediate- (n = 1,188), and high- (n = 552) risk groups and into three BED groups of < 140 Gy (n = 524), 140-200 Gy (n = 2284), and > 200 Gy (n = 1,115). Freedom from biochemical disease progression (biochemical freedom from failure [bFFF]) was determined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology and Phoenix definitions and calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with factors compared using the log-rank test. Results: The 10-year prostate-specific antigen bFFF rate for the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology Oncology and Phoenix definitions was 79.2% and 70%, respectively. The corresponding bFFF rates for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 84.1% and 78.1%,76.8% and 63.6%, and 64.4% and 58.2%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for the three BED groups was 56.1% and 41.4%,80% and 77.9%, and 91.1% and 82.9% (p < 0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for the low-risk patients by dose group was 69.8% and 49.8%, 86% and 85.2%, and 88.1% and 88.3% for the low-, intermediate, and high-dose group, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for the intermediate- risk patients by dose group was 52.9% and 23.1%, 74.1% and 77.7%, and 94.3% and 88.8% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose group, respectively (p < 0.0001). The corresponding bFFF rate for high-risk patients by dose group was 19.2% and 41.7%, 61.8% and 53.2%, and 90% and 69.6% for the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose group, respectively (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: These data suggest that permanent brachytherapy dose prescriptions can be customized to risk status. In low-risk patients, achieving a BED of >= 140 Gy might be adequate for prostate-specific antigen control. However, high-risk disease might require a BED dose of >= 200 Gy. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:1472 / 1477
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN BASED DISEASE-CONTROL FOLLOWING ULTRASOUND-GUIDED (125)IODINE IMPLANTATION FOR STAGE T1/T2 PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA [J].
BLASKO, JC ;
WALLNER, K ;
GRIMM, PD ;
RAGDE, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (03) :1096-1099
[2]  
Brenner DJ, 2002, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V52, P6
[3]   Biologically effective dose (BED) for interstitial seed implants containing a mixture of radionuclides with different half-lives [J].
Chen, Z ;
Nath, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 55 (03) :825-834
[4]  
DAMICO AV, 2003, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V292, P821
[5]   The definition of biochemical failure in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy [J].
Kattan, MW ;
Fearn, PA ;
Leibel, S ;
Potters, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 48 (05) :1469-1474
[6]   Role of hormonal therapy in the management of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer treated with permanent radioactive seed implantation [J].
Lee, LN ;
Stock, RG ;
Stone, NN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (02) :444-452
[7]   Dose escalation in permanent brachytherapy for prostate cancer: dosimetric and biological considerations [J].
Li, XA ;
Wang, JZ ;
Stewart, RD ;
DiBiase, SJ .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2003, 48 (17) :2753-2765
[8]   American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer [J].
Nag, S ;
Beyer, D ;
Friedland, J ;
Grimm, P ;
Nath, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (04) :789-799
[9]  
PETERS CA, 2006, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V36, P389
[10]   Prostate cancer radiation dose response: Results of the M. D. Anderson phase III randomized trial [J].
Pollack, A ;
Zagars, GK ;
Starkschall, G ;
Antolak, JA ;
Lee, JJ ;
Huang, E ;
von Eschenbach, AC ;
Kuban, DA ;
Rosen, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (05) :1097-1105