Supine PCNL-5 year experience in a tertiary care center

被引:2
作者
Gupta, Sandeep [1 ]
Sandhu, Ankit [1 ]
Pal, Dilip Kumar [1 ]
机构
[1] IPGMER, Dept Urol, 242 AJC Bose Rd, Kolkata 700020, W Bengal, India
关键词
Retrospective study; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; supine position; treatment outcome; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; POSITION; TUBELESS; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1177/03915603211046487
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: The prone position for percutaneous nephrolithomy (PCNL) has been widely practiced. There has been a shift from prone position to supine position which showed numerous benefits. The aim of our study is to describe the 5 year experience from the perspective of a tertiary care center using a modified Galdakao supine Valdivia position for total tubeless ultra mini supine PCNL, total tubeless supine PCNL, tubeless supine PCNL, and standard supine PCNL. Material and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of 90 patients who underwent supine PCNL at the tertiary care center during the period of 5 years from January 2017 to January 2021. The data collection was done from patients' medical records. Pre operatively, complete examination of the patients with laboratory investigations were done. The modified Clavien classification system was used to classify the perioperative complications of PCNL. Results: Operative time was lowest for ultra mini supine PCNL (50 +/- 10.4 min) compared to standard supine PCNL (58 +/- 11.2 min). Stones were single in 54 patients and multiple in 40 patients with 4 patients with staghorn stones. The size of the stones in the largest dimension ranged from 1.2 to 5.5 cm.Complete clearance was achieved in 84 (89.7%) patients. Seven patients (7.2%) developed mild fever and four patients (4.5%) required blood transfusion. Conclusion: We found supine PCNL to be an immensely convenient, time-saving practice, and with higher stone free rate compared to prone PCNL. The different techniques of supine PCNL were also useful in patients with horseshoe kidney and calyceal diverticulum which resulted in good outcomes in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:404 / 409
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Basiri A, 2009, UROL J, V6, P73
[2]   Supine versus prone PCNL: the debate continues ... [J].
Beiko, Darren .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2011, 5 (04) :266-267
[3]   PRONE FLEXIBLE CYSTOSCOPY - AN ADJUNCT TO PERCUTANEOUS STONE REMOVAL [J].
CLAYMAN, RV ;
BUB, P ;
HAAFF, E ;
DRESNER, S .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1987, 137 (01) :65-67
[4]   Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access:: A prospective randomized trial [J].
De Sio, Marco ;
Autorino, Riccardo ;
Quarto, Giuseppe ;
Calabro, Francesco ;
Damiano, Rocco ;
Giuyliano, Francesco ;
Mordente, Saluatore ;
D'Armiento, Massimo .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2008, 54 (01) :196-203
[5]   Ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (UMP): one more armamentarium [J].
Desai, Janak ;
Solanki, Ronak .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (07) :1046-1049
[6]   PERCUTANEOUS PYELOLITHOTOMY - NEW EXTRACTION TECHNIQUE [J].
FERNSTROM, I ;
JOHANSSON, B .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 1976, 10 (03) :257-259
[7]   Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review [J].
Ganpule, Arvind P. ;
Vijayakumar, Mohankumar ;
Malpani, Ankur ;
Desai, Mahesh R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 36 :660-664
[8]   PCNL in the twenty-first century: role of Microperc, Miniperc, and Ultraminiperc [J].
Ganpule, Arvind P. ;
Bhattu, Amit Satish ;
Desai, Mahesh .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 33 (02) :235-240
[9]   Observational prospective study for surgical outcome and anesthetic feasibility of tubeless and totally tubeless supine PCNL: A single centre initial experience [J].
Gupta, Sandeep ;
Maurya, Arun Kuamr ;
Pal, Dilip Kumar .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 45 (02) :146-149
[10]  
Hiremath, 2014, J SCI SOC, V41, P26