Volatility forecasting of crude oil market: Can the regime switching GARCH model beat the single-regime GARCH models?

被引:64
作者
Zhang, Yue-Jun [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Ting [1 ,2 ]
He, Ling-Yun [3 ]
Ripple, Ronald [4 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Management, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Inst Resource Environm & Sustainable Dev Res, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Tulsa, Collins Coll Business, 800 South Tucker Dr, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crude oil market; Volatility forecasting; GARCH; Regime switching; MCS; TIME-SERIES; STOCK-MARKET; CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY; FREQUENCY VOLATILITY; PRICE VOLATILITY; RISK; MOMENTS; FAMILY; RETURN;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2018.09.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
GARCH-type models are frequently used to forecast crude oil price volatility, and whether we should consider multiple regimes for the GARCH-type models is of great significance for the forecasting work but does not have a final conclusion yet. To that end, this paper estimates and forecasts crude oil price volatility using three single-regime GARCH (i.e., GARCH, GJR-GARCH and EGARCH) and two regime-switching GARCH (i.e., MMGARCH and MRS-GARCH) models. Furthermore, the Model Confidence Set (MCS) procedure is employed to evaluate the forecasting performance. The in-sample results show that the MRS-GARCH model provides higher estimation accuracy in weekly data. However, the out-of-sample results show the limited significance of considering the regime switching. Overall, our results indicate that the incorporation of regime switching does not perform significantly better than the single-regime GARCH models. The findings are proved to be robust to both daily and weekly data for WTI and Brent over different time horizons.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 317
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[32]   Forecasting the Chinese crude oil futures volatility using jump intensity and Markov-regime switching model [J].
Wu, Hanlin ;
Li, Pan ;
Cao, Jiawei ;
Xu, Zijian .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 134
[33]   Forecasting volatility of fuel oil futures in China: GARCH-type, SV or realized volatility models? [J].
Wei, Yu .
PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2012, 391 (22) :5546-5556
[34]   Forecasting the Chinese stock market volatility with international market volatilities: The role of regime switching [J].
Zhang, Yaojie ;
Lei, Likun ;
Wei, Yu .
NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE, 2020, 52
[35]   Consistency of maximum likelihood estimators for the regime-switching GARCH model [J].
Xie, Yingfu .
STATISTICS, 2009, 43 (02) :153-165
[36]   Improved Forecast Ability of Oil Market Volatility Based on combined Markov Switching and GARCH-class Model [J].
Yu Runfang ;
Du Jiangze ;
Liu Xiaotao .
5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND QUANTITATIVE MANAGEMENT, ITQM 2017, 2017, 122 :415-422
[37]   Forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures: The role of oil investor attention and its regime switching characteristics under a high- frequency framework [J].
Liu, Yuanyuan ;
Niu, Zibo ;
Suleman, Muhammad Tahir ;
Yin, Libo ;
Zhang, Hongwei .
ENERGY, 2022, 238
[38]   The L2-structures of standard and switching-regime GARCH models [J].
Francq, C ;
Zakoïan, JM .
STOCHASTIC PROCESSES AND THEIR APPLICATIONS, 2005, 115 (09) :1557-1582
[39]   Forecasting volatility in Chinese crude oil futures: insights from volatility-of-volatility and Markov regime-switching approaches [J].
Qiao, Gaoxiu ;
Pan, Yijun ;
Liang, Chao .
QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2024, 24 (12) :1839-1856
[40]   Modeling and Forecasting Stock Market Volatility by Gaussian Processes based on GARCH, EGARCH and GJR Models [J].
Ou, PhichHang ;
Wang, Hengshan .
WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING, WCE 2011, VOL I, 2011, :338-342