Volatility forecasting of crude oil market: Can the regime switching GARCH model beat the single-regime GARCH models?

被引:61
作者
Zhang, Yue-Jun [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Ting [1 ,2 ]
He, Ling-Yun [3 ]
Ripple, Ronald [4 ]
机构
[1] Hunan Univ, Sch Business, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Hunan Univ, Ctr Resource & Environm Management, Changsha 410082, Hunan, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Inst Resource Environm & Sustainable Dev Res, Guangzhou 510632, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Tulsa, Collins Coll Business, 800 South Tucker Dr, Tulsa, OK 74104 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crude oil market; Volatility forecasting; GARCH; Regime switching; MCS; TIME-SERIES; STOCK-MARKET; CONDITIONAL HETEROSKEDASTICITY; FREQUENCY VOLATILITY; PRICE VOLATILITY; RISK; MOMENTS; FAMILY; RETURN;
D O I
10.1016/j.iref.2018.09.006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
GARCH-type models are frequently used to forecast crude oil price volatility, and whether we should consider multiple regimes for the GARCH-type models is of great significance for the forecasting work but does not have a final conclusion yet. To that end, this paper estimates and forecasts crude oil price volatility using three single-regime GARCH (i.e., GARCH, GJR-GARCH and EGARCH) and two regime-switching GARCH (i.e., MMGARCH and MRS-GARCH) models. Furthermore, the Model Confidence Set (MCS) procedure is employed to evaluate the forecasting performance. The in-sample results show that the MRS-GARCH model provides higher estimation accuracy in weekly data. However, the out-of-sample results show the limited significance of considering the regime switching. Overall, our results indicate that the incorporation of regime switching does not perform significantly better than the single-regime GARCH models. The findings are proved to be robust to both daily and weekly data for WTI and Brent over different time horizons.
引用
收藏
页码:302 / 317
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条